Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Memory for Past Test.

The Underconfidence with Practice (UPW) effect (Koriat, Sheffer & Ma'ayan, 2002), found in multi-trial learning, is marked by a pattern of underconfidence accompanied by an increase in resolution between the judgments and test on and after the second trial. We tested whether the memory for past test (MPT) heuristic (Finn & Metcalfe, 2007) could explain the resolution and calibration effects. To selectively alter Trial 1 test performance, and hence MPT, we manipulated the number of repetitions (Experiment 1) or the study time (Experiment 2) on Trial 1, but then the manipulation was reversed on Trial 2, thereby equating final performance. Despite equivalent Trial 2 recall performance, Trial 2 JOLs reflected the manipulated Trial 1 test performance, providing support for the MPT hypothesis. Follow up experiments tested alternative explanations. We found that people could remember past test and that use of this information would produce both underconfidence and improved resolution. In contrast, neither memory for Trial 1 encoding fluency nor memory for Trial 1 JOLs was able to explain both aspects of the UWP effect. These experiments support the proposal that people use the Memory for Past Test heuristic to make second trial immediate JOLs, and that its use can account for the UWP effect.

[1]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Multiple study trials and judgments of learning. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[2]  G Mazzoni,et al.  Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation? , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[3]  R. Bjork,et al.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  W. Kintsch.  Learning, memory, and conceptual processes , 1970 .

[5]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  Judgments of knowing: The influence of retrieval practice. , 1980 .

[6]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Realism of confidence in obsessive-compulsive checkers. , 2000, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[8]  H. Halff.  The Role of Opportunities for Recall in Learning to Retrieve. , 1977 .

[9]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners’ sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[10]  John M. Gardiner,et al.  Memory for remembered events: Effects of response mode and response-produced feedback , 1977 .

[11]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective? , 1993 .

[12]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Aging and monitoring associative learning: is monitoring accuracy spared or impaired? , 2002 .

[15]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  J. Metcalfe.  Cognitive Optimism: Self-Deception or Memory-Based Processing Heuristics? , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[17]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Updating knowledge about encoding strategies: a componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[18]  L. Reder.  Implicit memory and metacognition , 1996 .

[19]  Nate Kornell,et al.  The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Dilek Önkal,et al.  Professional vs Amateur Judgment Accuracy: The Case of Foreign Exchange Rates , 2003 .

[21]  A. Koriat.  Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning , 1997 .

[22]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Gender Differences in Measured and Self-Estimated Trait Emotional Intelligence , 2000 .

[23]  John M. Gardiner,et al.  Memory for remembered events: An assessment of output monitoring in free recall , 1976 .

[24]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study During Multitrial Learning , 1994 .

[25]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Cognition and metacognition at extreme altitudes on Mount Everest. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Michael J. Serra,et al.  Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Does the Sensitivity of Judgments of Learning (JOLs) to the Effects of Various Study Activities Depend on When the JOLs Occur , 1994 .

[28]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Paired-associate acquisition as a function of number of initial nontest trials , 1974 .

[30]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Ian Begg,et al.  Memory predictions are based on ease of processing , 1989 .

[34]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  Similarity between the Cue for Judgments of Learning (JOL) and the Cue for Test Is Not the Primary Determinant of JOL Accuracy , 1997 .

[36]  J. Baranski,et al.  On the calibration of knowledge and perception. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[37]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning , 2005 .

[38]  K. Thiede.  The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  C Hertzog,et al.  Relationships between metamemory, memory predictions, and memory task performance in adults. , 1990, Psychology and aging.

[40]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Michael Friendly,et al.  The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words , 1982 .

[42]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  A. Koriat,et al.  Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  B. Murdock.  Human memory: Theory and data. , 1975 .

[45]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Judgments of Learning at Delays: Shifts in Response Patterns or Increased Metamemory Accuracy? , 1997 .

[46]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  A Region of Proximal Learning Model of Study Time Allocation Journal of Memory and Language , 2005 .

[48]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't. , 1980 .

[49]  E. Lovelace.  Metamemory: Monitoring Future Recallability During Study , 1984 .

[50]  R. Bjork,et al.  Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.