Series Title : Mitigating Value Mismatch at the Dynamic Interface of Stakeholder Preferences and Systems Options

The content in this paper is in pre-published, draft form. It has not been peer-reviewed and should be used for informational purposes only. The authors warn that the paper may contain typos, misquotes, incomplete, and possibly incorrect content. It is intended that the paper will be revised and elevated to " published " status, at which point the quality caveat will be lifted.

[1]  Nathan P. Diller,et al.  Utilizing Multiple Attribute Tradespace Exploration with Concurrent Design for creating aerospace systems requirements , 2002 .

[2]  Doyle,et al.  Highly optimized tolerance: robustness and design in complex systems , 2000, Physical review letters.

[3]  H. E. Cook,et al.  On the valuation of goods and selection of the best design alternative , 2001 .

[4]  Armin P. Schulz,et al.  Design for changeability (DfC): Principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle , 2005 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[6]  Whyte,et al.  Recasting Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[7]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[8]  J. Baron.  Thinking and deciding, 3rd ed. , 2000 .

[9]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Real and Misconceived Limitations to Decision Based Design With Utility Analysis , 2001 .

[10]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[11]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration with Concurrent Design for Space System Conceptual Design , 2003 .

[12]  David B. Stagney.  The integrated concurrent enterprise , 2003 .

[13]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Assessing Changeability in Aerospace Systems Architecting and Design Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration , 2006 .

[14]  J. F. Durgee.  Qualitative methods for identifying latent needs for new consumer technologies , 2001, IEMC'01 Proceedings. Change Management and the New Industrial Revolution. IEMC-2001 (Cat. No.01CH37286).

[15]  Jason Edward Derleth,et al.  Multi-attribute tradespace exploration and its application to evolutionary acquisition , 2003 .

[16]  Timothy J. Spaulding,et al.  Tools for evolutionary acquisition : a study of Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration (MATE) applied to the Space Based Radar (SBR) , 2003 .

[17]  Adam Michael Ross,et al.  Managing unarticulated value : changeability in multi-attribute tradespace exploration , 2006 .

[18]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .

[19]  Adam M. Ross.  Multi-attribute Tradespace Exploration , 2005 .

[20]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm , 2005 .

[21]  Roshanak Nilchiani,et al.  Measuring space systems flexibility : a comprehensive six-element framework , 2005 .

[22]  G. Hazelrigg.  Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design , 1996 .

[23]  Carlson,et al.  Dynamics and changing environments in highly optimized tolerance , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[24]  James R. Simpson,et al.  Robust Design and Analysis for Quality Engineering , 1998 .

[25]  Nirav B. Shah,et al.  Modularity as an enabler for evolutionary acquisition , 2004 .