Comparison of radiographic and photographic measurement of mandibular asymmetry.

This study compared measurement of mandibular asymmetry by digitization of mandibular outlines from standardized facial photographs and posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Four ratios were used in calculating asymmetry: area (relative size of right and left mandibular segments), perimeter or length of outlines, compactness (shape), and moment. The records of 28 patients with varying degrees of asymmetry were used. A significant relationship was found for 3 of the ratios (area, compactness, and moment) between measurements from photographs and radiographs. A further comparison showed that measurements from the radiographs correlated more closely with those from photographs when the mastoid processes were used as a baseline, rather than latero-orbitale. Repeatability of mandibular outline digitization proved satisfactory. Although digitization from standardized photographs is the preferred approach, the results indicated that posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs can be used similarly. Unlike other cephalometric analyses for mandibular asymmetry, this method avoids problems of landmark identification, thus presenting a clinically useful method of quantifying asymmetry, eg, in auditing the surgical-orthodontic correction of asymmetry or monitoring change over time.

[1]  A. Basyouni,et al.  An atlas of the transverse dimensions of the face , 2000 .

[2]  C. Sadowsky,et al.  Mandibular skeletal and dental asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusions. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  D. Wertheim,et al.  Clinical and computerized assessment of mandibular asymmetry. , 2001, European journal of orthodontics.

[4]  L. Claman,et al.  Standardized portrait photography for dental patients. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  Grummons Dc,et al.  A frontal asymmetry analysis. , 1987 .

[6]  David Wertheim,et al.  A system for assessing mandibular outlines , 2000 .

[7]  A. B. Hewitt A Radiographic Study of Facial Asymmetry , 1975, British journal of orthodontics.

[8]  C. Sadowsky,et al.  An evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in adults with unilateral posterior crossbite. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  F. Mongini,et al.  A computer-based assessment of structural and displacement asymmetries of the mandible. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[11]  R. Pigott,et al.  A computer-aided method of measuring nasal symmetry in the cleft lip nose. , 1993, British journal of plastic surgery.

[12]  C T Forsberg,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment planning of skeletal asymmetry with the submental-vertical radiograph. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[13]  F Bookstein,et al.  Analysis of craniofacial asymmetry by multiplane cephalometry. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[14]  B. Matthews,et al.  A computer-based method of measuring facial asymmetry. Results from an assessment of the repair of cleft lip deformities. , 1987, British journal of plastic surgery.

[15]  F S Chebib,et al.  Indices of craniofacial asymmetry. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[16]  J P Moss,et al.  Methods of three dimensional analysis of patients with asymmetry of the face. , 1991, Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society. Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran toimituksia.

[17]  P. Westesson,et al.  Prepubertal trauma and mandibular asymmetry in orthognathic surgery and orthodontic patients. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  A E Athanasiou,et al.  Random Errors in Localization of Landmarks in Postero-anterior Cephalograms , 1999, British journal of orthodontics.

[19]  R. Pigott,et al.  A 20 year audit of nose-tip symmetry in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. , 2001, British journal of plastic surgery.

[20]  R M Ricketts,et al.  An overview of computerized cephalometrics. , 1972, American journal of orthodontics.

[21]  W. Bengel Standardization in dental photography. , 1985, International dental journal.

[22]  David Wertheim,et al.  Mandibular outline assessment in three groups of orthodontic patients. , 2002, European journal of orthodontics.

[23]  A. Beckett,et al.  OCCUPATIONAL BLADDER TUMOURS AND THE CONTROL OF CARCINOGENS. , 1965, Lancet.

[24]  J. Cook Asymmetry of the Cranio-facial Skeleton , 1980, British journal of orthodontics.

[25]  W. Proffit,et al.  Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment , 1990 .

[26]  S Peck,et al.  Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[27]  J H Kronman,et al.  A posteroanterior cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry. , 1967, The Angle orthodontist.

[28]  Proffit Wr,et al.  The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. , 1997 .