Adjustments of Response Threshold during Task Switching: A Model-Based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Adjustment of response threshold for speed compared with accuracy instructions in two-choice decision-making tasks is associated with activation in the fronto-striatal network, including the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and striatum (Forstmann et al., 2008). In contrast, increased response conservativeness is associated with activation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) (Frank et al., 2007). We investigated the involvement of these regions in trial-by-trial adjustments of response threshold in humans, using a cued-trials task-switching paradigm. Fully and partially informative switch cues produced more conservative thresholds than repeat cues. Repeat cues were associated with higher activation in pre-SMA and striatum than switch cues. For all cue types, individual variability in response threshold was associated with activation level in pre-SMA, with higher activation linked to lower threshold setting. In the striatum, this relationship was found for repeat cues only. These findings support the notion that pre-SMA biases the striatum to lower response threshold under more liberal response regimens. In contrast, a high threshold for switch cues was associated with greater activation in right STN, consistent with increasing response caution under conservative response regimens. We conclude that neural models of response threshold adjustment can help explain executive control processes in task switching.

[1]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  R. Bogacz,et al.  The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Mapping the functional anatomy of task preparation: Priming task‐appropriate brain networks , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[5]  J. B. Preston,et al.  Interconnections between the prefrontal cortex and the premotor areas in the frontal lobe , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Understanding decision-making deficits in neurological conditions: insights from models of natural action selection , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  J. Mink.  THE BASAL GANGLIA: FOCUSED SELECTION AND INHIBITION OF COMPETING MOTOR PROGRAMS , 1996, Progress in Neurobiology.

[8]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Changes in connectivity profiles define functionally distinct regions in human medial frontal cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling Geometric Deformations in Epi Time Series , 2022 .

[11]  J. Thayer,et al.  The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[12]  M. Hughes,et al.  The spatial and temporal dynamics of anticipatory preparation and response inhibition in task-switching , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  The Neural and Computational Basis of Controlled Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff during Task Performance , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[15]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Neural mechanisms for response selection: comparing selection of responses and items from working memory , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  Stephen M Fleming,et al.  Overcoming status quo bias in the human brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  E. Stein,et al.  Multiple Neuronal Networks Mediate Sustained Attention , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Han L. J. van der Maas,et al.  On the mean and variance of response times under the diffusion model with an application to parameter estimation , 2009 .

[20]  Jun Tanji,et al.  Prefrontal cortical cells projecting to the supplementary eye field and presupplementary motor area in the monkey , 2005, Neuroscience Research.

[21]  Sharna Jamadar,et al.  Advance Preparation in Task-Switching: Converging Evidence from Behavioral, Brain Activation, and Model-Based Approaches , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[22]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Predicting Success: Patterns of Cortical Activation and Deactivation Prior to Response Inhibition , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Premovement activity of the pre-supplementary motor area and the readiness for action: studies of time-resolved event-related functional MRI. , 2005, Human movement science.

[24]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Hold your horses: A dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making , 2006, Neural Networks.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event‐related f MRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.