Examining the effectiveness of physical threats in road safety advertising: The role of the third-person effect, gender, and age

Threatening advertisements have been widely used in the social marketing of road safety. However, despite their popularity and over five decades of research into the fear-persuasion relationship, an unequivocal answer regarding their effectiveness remains unachieved. More contemporary "fear appeal" research has explored the extent other variables moderate this relationship. In this study, the third-person effect was examined to explore its association with the extent male and female drivers reported intentions to adopt the recommendations of two road safety advertisements depicting high physical threats. Drivers (N = 152) first provided responses on pre-exposure future driving intentions, subsequently viewed two advertisements, one anti-speeding and one anti-drink driving, followed by measurement of their perceptions and post-manipulation intentions. The latter measure, post-manipulation intentions, was taken as the level of message acceptance for each advertisement. Results indicated a significant gender difference with females reporting reverse third-person effects (i.e., the messages would have more influence on themselves than others) and males reporting classic third-person effects (i.e., the messages would have more influence on others than themselves). Consistent with such third-person effects, females reported greater intention not to speed and not to drink and drive after being exposed to the advertisements than males. To determine the extent that third-person differential perceptions contributed to variance explained in post-manipulation intentions, hierarchical regressions were conducted. These regressions revealed that third-person scores significantly contributed to the variance explained in post-manipulation intentions, beyond the contribution of other factors including demographic characteristics, pre-exposure intentions and past behaviour. The theoretical and applied implications of the results are discussed.

[1]  I. Janis,et al.  Effect of fear-arousing communications. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  Herbert Jack Rotfeld,et al.  Misplaced marketing commentary: social marketing and myths of appeals to fear , 1999 .

[3]  Douglas Eadie,et al.  Development and evaluation of a mass media Theory of Planned Behaviour intervention to reduce speeding. , 2004, Health education research.

[4]  Teresa Brannick,et al.  Fear Appeals: Segmentation is the Way to Go , 1992 .

[5]  M. Allen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[6]  Irving L. Janis,et al.  Effects of Fear Arousal on Attitude Change: Recent Developments in Theory and Experimental Research1 , 1967 .

[7]  Richard Tay,et al.  Exploring the Effects of a Road Safety Advertising Campaign on the Perceptions and Intentions of the Target and Nontarget Audiences to Drink and Drive , 2002 .

[8]  G. Hastings,et al.  Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern , 2004 .

[9]  James R. Lumpkin,et al.  Differences in Attitudes toward TV Advertising: VCR Usage as a Moderator , 1992 .

[10]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change , 1983 .

[11]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Effects of High and Low Fear-Arousing Communications upon Opinions toward Smoking , 1965 .

[12]  K. Higbee,et al.  Fifteen years of fear arousal: research on threat appeals: 1953-1968. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Roger Bennett,et al.  Effects of Horrific Fear Appeals on Public Attitudes Towards AIDS , 1996 .

[14]  Franklin J. Boster,et al.  Fear-Arousing Persuasive Messages , 1984 .

[15]  R. Oliver,et al.  Fear Appeal Effects in the Field: A Segmentation Approach , 1979 .

[16]  D. Haefner,et al.  AROUSING FEAR IN DENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION , 1965 .

[17]  S Sutton,et al.  Shock tactics and the myth of the inverted U. , 1992, British journal of addiction.

[18]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise , 2005 .

[19]  Diana C. Mutz THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEPTIONS OF MEDIA INFLUENCE: THIRD PERSON EFFECTS AND THE PUBLIC EXPRESSION OF OPINIONS* , 1989 .

[20]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Overrating the X‐Rating: The Third‐Person Perception and Support for Censorship of Pornography , 1995 .

[21]  Richard Tay,et al.  The effectiveness of enforcement and publicity campaigns on serious crashes involving young male drivers: Are drink driving and speeding similar? , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  K Witte,et al.  Preventing the Spread of Genital Warts: Using Fear Appeals to Promote Self-Protective Behaviors , 1998, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[23]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[24]  B Elliott The psychology of fear appeals revisited , 2003 .

[25]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Perceived Influence of AIDS Advertising: Third-Person Effects in the Context of Positive Media Content , 1995 .

[26]  Warren A Harrison,et al.  Investigation of audience perceptions of Transport Accident Commission road safety advertising , 2000 .

[27]  Richard Tay,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ANTI-DRINK DRIVING ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN IN NEW ZEALAND , 1999 .

[28]  G. C. Chan,et al.  INEFFECTIVENESS OF THREAT APPEALS ABOUT DRINKING AND DRIVING , 1982 .

[29]  R. Rogers Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of prote , 1983 .

[30]  Julian de Meyrick,et al.  Forget the “blood and gore”: an alternative message strategy to help adolescents avoid cigarette smoking , 2001 .

[31]  James Price Dillard,et al.  The Multiple Affective Outcomes of AIDS PSAs , 1996 .

[32]  Nadine Henley,et al.  Social marketing: Principles and practice , 2004 .

[33]  M. Goldberg,et al.  What to Convey in Antismoking Advertisements for Adolescents: The use of Protection Motivation Theory to Identify Effective Message Themes , 2003 .

[34]  W. Davison The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .

[35]  Nadine Henley,et al.  Road safety advertising: an empirical study and literature review , 1995 .

[36]  Margaret M. Peden,et al.  World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2004 .

[37]  K. Witte Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model , 1992 .

[38]  Michael S. LaTour,et al.  There are Threats and (Maybe) Fear-Caused Arousal: Theory and Confusions of Appeals to Fear and Fear Arousal Itself , 1997 .

[39]  J. C. Watts,et al.  Sources of resistance to fear-arousing communications on smoking and lung cancer. , 1966, Journal of personality.

[40]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Fear Appeals: Revisited and Revised , 1974 .

[41]  R. Tay,et al.  Changing Drivers' Intentions and Behaviours Using Fear-Based Driver Fatigue Advertisements , 2002, Health marketing quarterly.

[42]  Julie M. Duck,et al.  The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect , 1995 .

[43]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Biased Optimism and the Third-Person Effect , 1993 .

[44]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Perceived Persuasive Effects of Product Commercials and Public Service Announcements , 1992 .

[45]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Fear: The potential of an appeal neglected by marketing. , 1970 .

[46]  James L Nichols,et al.  Effectiveness of mass media campaigns for reducing drinking and driving and alcohol-involved crashes: a systematic review. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.