Order and flexibility in the motion of fish schools.

The coexistence of order and flexibility in the motion of fish schools was studied by using a simple numerical model and a computer simulation. The numerical model is based on behavioral rules for individuals in the school by considering attraction, repulsion, and parallel-orientation behavior. Each individual follows the same rules and makes school movements. The simulation results show that school order and flexibility are affected by the number of neighbors interacting with an individual in the school and by the randomness of individual motion. Increase in the number of interacting neighbors leads to high order, especially when the number increases from a low value (between one and three). An optimal number of interacting neighbors exists that is relatively low (two or three) for high flexibility, indicating that a fish needs only to pay attention to a few neighbors to realize both order and flexibility. The low randomness of individual motion benefits both order and flexibility. These results indicate that schooling fish have evolved specialized ability for establishing both school order and flexibility.

[1]  H. A. Baldwin,et al.  Methods for measuring the three-dimensional structure of fish schools. , 1965, Animal behaviour.

[2]  Ramón Margalef.  Perspectives in Ecological Theory , 1968 .

[3]  D. B. Siniff,et al.  A Simulation Model of Animal Movement Patterns , 1969 .

[4]  J. Hunter,et al.  Some Aspects of the Organization of Fish Schools , 1970 .

[5]  W. Hamilton.  Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  Sumiko Sakai,et al.  A Model for group structure and its behavior , 1973 .

[7]  Nobuo Sannomiya,et al.  Computer Simulation of Fish Behavior in Relation to Fishing Gear-I , 1980 .

[8]  I. Aoki.  An analysis of the schooling behavior of fish: Internal organization and communication process. , 1980 .

[9]  A. Ōkubo,et al.  Di?usion and ecological problems: mathematical models , 1980 .

[10]  B. Partridge,et al.  The effect of school size on the structure and dynamics of minnow schools , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  I. Aoki.  A simulation study on the schooling mechanism in fish. , 1982 .

[12]  B L Partridge,et al.  The structure and function of fish schools. , 1982, Scientific American.

[13]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Predator-avoidance behaviours of sand-eel schools: why schools seldom split , 1983 .

[14]  D. Noakes,et al.  Predators and Prey in Fishes , 1983 .

[15]  Stock assessment of Japanese sardine in the waters off the southeast coast of Hokkaido using line transect method , 1986 .

[16]  T. Pitcher.  Functions of Shoaling Behaviour in Teleosts , 1986 .

[17]  A. Ōkubo.  Dynamical aspects of animal grouping: swarms, schools, flocks, and herds. , 1986, Advances in biophysics.

[18]  C. S. Wardle,et al.  Predator evasion in a fish school: test of a model for the fountain effect , 1986 .

[19]  Swimming speed of sardine school on the basis of aerial survey , 1987 .

[20]  S. Gueron,et al.  A model of herd grazing as a travelling wave, chemotaxis and stability , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.

[21]  K. Warburton,et al.  Tendency-distance models of social cohesion in animal groups. , 1991, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[22]  A. Huth,et al.  The simulation of the movement of fish schools , 1992 .

[23]  S. Gueron,et al.  Self-organization of front patterns in large wildebeest herds , 1993 .

[24]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Balancing Foraging and Antipredator Demands: An Advantage of Sociality , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[25]  Hiro-Sato Niwa.  Self-organizing Dynamic Model of Fish Schooling , 1994 .

[26]  A. Ōkubo,et al.  MODELLING SOCIAL ANIMAL AGGREGATIONS , 1994 .

[27]  Paolo Domenici,et al.  Escape manoeuvres of schooling Clupea harengus , 1994 .

[28]  T. Powell.  Physical and Biological Scales of Variability in Lakes, Estuaries, and the Coastal Ocean , 1995 .

[29]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[30]  W. L. Romey.  Individual differences make a difference in the trajectories of simulated schools of fish , 1996 .

[31]  S. Gueron,et al.  The Dynamics of Herds: From Individuals to Aggregations , 1996 .

[32]  Hiro-Sato Niwa,et al.  Newtonian Dynamical Approach to Fish Schooling , 1996 .

[33]  Paolo Domenici,et al.  Escape behaviour of solitary herring (Clupea harengus ) and comparisons with schooling individuals , 1997 .

[34]  Craig W. Reynolds.  Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1998 .

[35]  D. Grünbaum,et al.  From individuals to aggregations: the interplay between behavior and physics. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  G. F.,et al.  From individuals to aggregations: the interplay between behavior and physics. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  Leif Nøttestad,et al.  Herring schooling manoeuvres in response to killer whale attacks , 1999 .

[38]  Yajie Tian,et al.  Emergence of Cooperation in Fish Behavior Models , 1999 .

[39]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[40]  P. Domenici,et al.  Spacing of wild schooling herring while encircled by killer whales , 2000 .

[41]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  The Dynamics of Animal Grouping , 2001 .

[42]  D. Grünbaum.  Schooling as a strategy for taxis in a noisy environment , 1998, Evolutionary Ecology.

[43]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of fish schools , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[44]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The sensory basis of fish schools: Relative roles of lateral line and vision , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[45]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Fish in larger shoals find food faster , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[46]  J. Godin,et al.  Predator avoidance and school size in a cyprinodontid fish, the banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus Lesueur) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.