Compliance with Canada’s Fisheries Act: A Field Audit of Habitat Compensation Projects

Loss of fish habitat in North America has occurred at an unprecedented rate through the last century. In response, the Canadian Parliament enacted the habitat provisions of the Fisheries Act. Under these provisions, a “harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction to fish habitat” (HADD) cannot occur unless authorised by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), with legally binding compensatory habitat to offset the HADD. The guiding principle to DFO’s conservation goal is “no net loss of the productive capacity of fish habitats” (NNL). However, performance in achieving NNL has never been evaluated on a national scale. We investigated 52 habitat compensation projects across Canada to determine compliance with physical, biological, and chemical requirements of Section 35(2) Fisheries Act authorisations. Biological requirements had the lowest compliance (58%) and chemical requirements the highest (100%). Compliance with biological requirements differed among habitat categories and was poorest (19% compliance) in riparian habitats. Approximately 86% of authorisations had larger HADD and/or smaller compensation areas than authorised. The largest noncompliance in terms of habitat area occurred in riverine habitat in which HADDs were, on average, 343% larger than initially authorised. In total, 67% of compensation projects resulted in net losses of habitat area, 2% resulted in no net loss, and 31% achieved a net gain in habitat area. Interestingly, probable violations of the Fisheries Act were prevalent at half of the projects. Analyses indicated that the frequency of probable Fisheries Act violations differed among provinces. Habitat compensation to achieve NNL, as currently implemented in Canada, is at best only slowing the rate of habitat loss. In all likelihood, increasing the amount of authorised compensatory habitat in the absence of institutional changes will not reverse this trend. Improvements in monitoring and enforcement are necessary to move towards achieving Canada’s conservation goals.

[1]  D J Harper,et al.  No Net Loss of Fish Habitat: A Review and Analysis of Habitat Compensation in Canada , 2005, Environmental management.

[2]  Charles Andrew Cole,et al.  Section 404 Wetland Mitigation and Permit Success Criteria in Pennsylvania, USA, 1986–1999 , 2002, Environmental management.

[3]  G. Seber,et al.  Estimating Population Parameters from Catches Large Relative to the Population , 1967 .

[4]  J. Quigley,et al.  A Comparison of the Areal Extent of Fish Habitat Gains and Losses Associated with Selected Compensation Projects in Canada , 2005 .

[5]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Sustainable Fisheries Management , 1999 .

[6]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science. , 1990 .

[7]  T. Northcote,et al.  Science and Management in Sustainable Salmonid Fisheries: The Ball is Not in Our Court , 2001 .

[8]  C. Lant,et al.  The Effect of Wetland Mitigation Banking on the Achievement of No-Net-Loss , 1999, Environmental management.

[9]  J. Boyd.  Compensating for Wetland Losses under the Clean Water Act , 2002 .

[10]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  Impacts of section 404 permits requiring compensatory mitigation of freshwater wetlands in Texas and Arkansas , 1993 .

[11]  Philip M Fearnside,et al.  Brazil’s Samuel Dam: Lessons for Hydroelectric Development Policy and the Environment in Amazonia , 2005, Environmental management.

[12]  Margaret S. Race,et al.  Fixing Compensatory Mitigation: What Will it Take? , 1996 .

[13]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  Impacts of section 404 permits requiring compensatory mitigation on wetlands in California (USA) , 2004, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[14]  C. K. Minns,et al.  Assessment of net change of productive capacity of fish habitats: the role of uncertainty and complexity in decision making , 2003 .

[15]  G. A. Goodchild.  Fish habitat is everyone's business, Canada's fish habitat management programme , 2004 .

[16]  J. Robb.  Assessing wetland compensatory mitigation sites to aid in establishing mitigation ratios , 2002, Wetlands.