The role of communication in the formation of an issue-based citizenry

Citizens can gain a better understanding of the important issues of a campaign and where candidates stand on those issues from three primary sources: direct candidate-to-citizen mass media messages (e.g., political advertisements, debates), news (e.g., newspapers, television news), or discussion with fellow citizens. The current study conducted a secondary analysis of 1996 American National Election Study (ANES) data to replicate Brians and Wattenberg's (1996) findings concerning the relative influence of political advertisements, television news use, and newspaper use on voter issue knowledge and salience in the 1992 United States presidential campaign. We also analyzed two additional communication information sources, general political discussion and debate viewing. The effects of political advertisement recall, television news viewing, and newspaper use replicated across election studies. General political discussion was found to affect both issue knowledge and salience, and when introduced into the regression analyses nullifies the predictive power of political advertisement recall for knowledge. Talk's influence on salience wanes in subsequent analyses. Viewing the first debate was a strong predictor of issue knowledge, but was not associated with issue salience. Advertisement recall maintained predictive power for issue salience even after taking into account the other four information sources, and watching the second debate also predicted salience. The combination of results presents evidence that candidate-to-citizen and citizen-to-citizen communication play unique roles in determining levels of issue knowledge and salience.

[1]  E. Thorson,et al.  Assessing public journalism , 1998 .

[2]  Samuel J. Best,et al.  Maximizing “Minimal Effects” , 1999 .

[3]  Michael J. Robinson.  The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Elections. By Patterson Thomas E. and McClure Robert D.. (New York: G. P. Putman's Sons, 1976. Pp. 218. $7.95.) , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Daniel G. McDonald,et al.  BEYOND SIMPLE EXPOSURE , 1985 .

[5]  Cliff Zukin,et al.  Political Imagery and Information in an Age of Television , 1978 .

[6]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation , 1999 .

[7]  Larry M. Bartels,et al.  Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable ? , 2004 .

[8]  Bruce A. Williams,et al.  Methods, Metaphors, and Media Research , 1994 .

[9]  B. Barber.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[10]  John P. Robinson,et al.  The Main Source: Learning from Television News , 1986 .

[11]  D. Weaver,et al.  Voter Learning and Interest in the 2000 Presidential Election: Did the Media Matter? , 2001 .

[12]  Craig Leonard Brians,et al.  Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News and Newspapers , 1996 .

[13]  Elihu Katz,et al.  News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The Part Played by Conversation in Deliberative Democracy , 1999 .

[14]  Jian-hua Zhu,et al.  Do Televised Debates Affect Image Perception More Than Issue Knowledge?A Study of the First 1992 Presidential Debate , 1994 .

[15]  David H. Weaver,et al.  The Bridging Function of Interpersonal Communication in Agenda-Setting , 1992 .

[16]  Gary King,et al.  Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable? , 1993, British Journal of Political Science.

[17]  D. J. Lanoue,et al.  The effects of primary season debates on public opinion , 1989 .

[18]  Thomas E. Patterson,et al.  The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President , 1980 .

[19]  D. Scheufele.  Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication , 2000 .

[20]  Robert O. Wyatt,et al.  Bridging the spheres: political and personal conversation in public and private spaces , 2000 .

[21]  K. Jamieson,et al.  What Can Voters Learn from Election Debates , 2000 .

[22]  M. Mckubre.  The Importance of Replication , 2007 .

[23]  D. J. Webber,et al.  Effects of Presidential Debate Watching and Ideology on Attitudes and Knowledge. , 1998 .

[24]  Ann N. Crigler,et al.  Thirty Seconds or Thirty Minutes: What Viewers Learn from Spot Advertisements and Candidate Debates , 1990 .

[25]  Dietram A. Scheufele.  Talk or Conversation? Dimensions of Interpersonal Discussion and Their Implications for Participatory Democracy , 2000 .

[26]  David Weaver,et al.  Voter Learning in the 1988 Presidential Election: Did the Debates and the Media Matter? , 1991 .

[27]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[28]  Xinshu Zhao,et al.  Political Knowledge and the Campaign Media of 1992 , 1994 .

[29]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Effects of Watching Primary Debates in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Campaign. , 2002 .

[30]  Allan J. Lichtman.  The keys to the White House, 1996 : a surefire guide to predicting the next president , 1997 .

[31]  William L. Benoit.  Seeing spots : a functional analysis of presidential television advertisements, 1952-1996 , 1999 .

[32]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Beyond learning and persona: extending the scope of presidential debate effects , 2001 .

[33]  Steven H. Chaffee,et al.  CAMPAIGN ADVERTISEMENTS VERSUS TELEVISION NEWS AS SOURCES OF POLITICAL ISSUE INFORMATION , 1995 .

[34]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Replication in behavioral research. , 1990 .

[35]  D. Graber,et al.  Mass media and American politics , 1980 .

[36]  William L. Benoit.  Topic of presidential campaign discourse and election outcome , 2003 .

[37]  Wayne Wanta,et al.  Interpersonal Communication and the Agenda-Setting Process , 1992 .

[38]  Hugh M. Culbertson,et al.  HOW MEDIA USE AND RELIANCE AFFECT KNOWLEDGE LEVEL , 1986 .

[39]  John Gastil,et al.  Increasing Political Sophistication Through Public Deliberation , 1999 .

[40]  Montague Kern,et al.  30-Second Politics: Political Advertising in the Eighties , 1989 .

[41]  Kathleen Hall Jamieson,et al.  Packaging the Presidency: A History and Criticism of Presidential Campaign Advertising , 1984 .

[42]  William L. Benoit.  The functional approach to presidential television spots: Acclaiming, attacking, defending 1952–2000 , 2001 .

[43]  M. J. Robinson,et al.  Over the Wire and on TV: CBS and UPI in Campaign '80. , 1984 .

[44]  Stephen Coleman.  Televised Election Debates: International Perspectives , 1999 .

[45]  S. Robert Lichter,et al.  Good Intentions Make Bad News: Why Americans Hate Campaign Journalism , 1995 .

[46]  Ann N. Crigler,et al.  Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign , 1996 .

[47]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The people's choice. , 1945 .