Off-label-use of sulfur-hexafluoride in voiding urosonography for diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children: A survey on adverse events

AIM To evaluate the risk profile of sulfur hexafluoride in voiding urosonography (VUS) based on a large cohort of children. METHODS Since 2011 sulfur hexafluoride (SH, SonoVue®, Bracco, Italy) is the only ultrasound contrast available in the European Union and its use in children has not been approved. Within a 4-year-period, 531 children with suspected or proven vesicoureteral reflux (f/m = 478/53; mean age 4.9 years; 1 mo-25.2 years) following parental informed consent underwent VUS with administration of 2.6 ± 1.2 mL SH in a two-center study. A standardized telephone survey on adverse events was conducted three days later. RESULTS No acute adverse reactions were observed. The survey revealed subacute, mostly self-limited adverse events in 4.1% (22/531). The majority of observed adverse events (17/22) was not suspected to be caused by an allergic reaction: Five were related to catheter placement, three to reactivated urinary tract infections, five were associated with perineal disinfection before voiding urosonography or perineal dermatitis and four with a common cold. In five patients (0.9%) hints to a potential allergic cause were noted: Perineal urticaria was reported in three interviews and isolated, mild fever in two. These were minor self-limited adverse events with a subacute onset and no hospital admittance was necessary. Ninety-six point two percent of the parents would prefer future VUS examinations with use of SH. CONCLUSION No severe adverse events were observed and indications of self-limited minor allergic reactions related to intravesical administration of SH were reported in less than 1%.

[1]  J. Foreman,et al.  Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in children with vesicoureteral reflux: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[2]  T. Derlin,et al.  Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography phantom study: intravenous iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents may cause false-negative results in assessment of vesicoureteral reflux in children , 2015, Pediatric Radiology.

[3]  K. Darge,et al.  Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography with intravesical administration of a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent for diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux: prospective evaluation of contrast safety in 1,010 children , 2014, Pediatric Radiology.

[4]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Safety of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children for non-cardiac applications: a review by the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the International Contrast Ultrasound Society (ICUS) , 2013, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  M. Riccabona Application of a second-generation US contrast agent in infants and children—a European questionnaire-based survey , 2012, Pediatric Radiology.

[6]  L. Riera,et al.  Voiding urosonography including urethrosonography: high-quality examinations with an optimised procedure using a second-generation US contrast agent , 2012, Pediatric Radiology.

[7]  T. Kersnik Levart,et al.  A comparison of echo‐enhanced voiding urosonography with X‐ray voiding cystourethrography in the first year of life , 2012, Acta paediatrica.

[8]  C. Durán,et al.  Voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent versus voiding cystourethrography , 2011, Pediatric Nephrology.

[9]  A. Szabó,et al.  Voiding urosonography with second-generation contrast agent versus voiding cystourethrography , 2010, Pediatric Nephrology.

[10]  K. Darge Voiding urosonography with US contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children: an update , 2010, Pediatric Radiology.

[11]  K. Darge,et al.  Harmonic voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux , 2009, Pediatric Radiology.

[12]  R. Kenda,et al.  Ureteric jet Doppler waveform: is it a reliable predictor of vesicoureteric reflux in children? , 2009, Pediatric Nephrology.

[13]  P. Strisciuglio,et al.  Which cystography in the diagnosis and grading of vesicoureteral reflux? , 2008, Pediatric Nephrology.

[14]  K. Darge Voiding urosonography with ultrasound contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children , 2007, Pediatric Radiology.

[15]  C. Tsampoulas,et al.  Cyclic contrast-enhanced harmonic voiding urosonography for the evaluation of reflux. Can we keep the cost of the examination low? , 2006, European Radiology.

[16]  D. Ridout,et al.  The presence of vesicoureteric reflux does not identify a population at risk for renal scarring following a first urinary tract infection , 2005, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[17]  C. Visalli,et al.  Harmonic US imaging of vesicoureteric reflux in children: usefulness of a second generation US contrast agent , 2004, Pediatric Radiology.

[18]  M. Galia,et al.  Vesicoureteral reflux in young patients: Comparison of voiding color Doppler US with echo enhancement versus voiding cystourethrography for diagnosis or exclusion , 2004, Abdominal Imaging.

[19]  K. Itoh,et al.  Simultaneous voiding cystourethrography and voiding urosonography: an in vitro and in vivo study. , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[20]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Voiding urosonography with ultrasonography contrast medium in children , 2002, Pediatric Nephrology.

[21]  F. Gayá,et al.  Vesicoureteral reflux: diagnosis and grading with echo-enhanced cystosonography versus voiding cystourethrography. , 2001, Radiology.

[22]  A. Valentini,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced gray‐scale and color doppler voiding urosonography versus voiding cystourethrography in the diagnosis and grading of vesicoureteral reflux , 2001, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[23]  K Moehring,et al.  Reflux in young patients: comparison of voiding US of the bladder and retrovesical space with echo enhancement versus voiding cystourethrography for diagnosis. , 1999, Radiology.

[24]  P. Corr Echo enhancing agents in ultrasound , 1996 .

[25]  R. Schlief Developments in echo-enhancing agents. , 1996, Clinical Radiology.

[26]  Feng Yan,et al.  BR1: A New Ultrasonographic Contrast Agent Based on Sulfur Hexafluoride-Filled Microbubbles , 1995, Investigative radiology.

[27]  B. Shulkin,et al.  Postprocedural symptoms in children who undergo imaging studies of the urinary tract: is it the contrast material or the catheter? , 1992, Radiology.

[28]  S. Koff,et al.  Estimating bladder capacity in children. , 1983, Urology.

[29]  M. Riccabona,et al.  Pediatric uroradiology: state of the art , 2010, Pediatric Radiology.

[30]  M. Franchini,et al.  Evaluating kidney damage from vesico-ureteral reflux in children. , 2009, Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation : an official publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Saudi Arabia.

[31]  D. Coplen Harmonic voiding urosonography with a second-generation contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux , 2009 .

[32]  K. Darge Voiding urosonography with US contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children , 2007, Pediatric Radiology.

[33]  P. Zimmern,et al.  Contrast media reactions during voiding cystourethrography or retrograde pyelography. , 1993, Urology.