What is the clinically relevant change on the ADAS-Cog?

Objective To establish the minimal clinically relevant change (MCRC) on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) for patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). Design Cohort study. Setting 59 recruiting sites for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Patients Outpatients with AD in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Main outcome measures The authors applied anchor-based MCRC methodology comparing ADAS-Cog change against clinicians' judgement of clinically relevant worsening between baseline and 6 months in four domains: memory and non-memory cognitive performance; Clinical Dementia Rating Scale; and Functional Assessment Questionnaire. The analysis was repeated for the 6–12-month interval. To support these findings, the authors calculated distribution-based measures including half-baseline SD (1/2 SD) and SEM. Results 181 patients (baseline ADAS-Cog score 18.5±6.4) had ADAS-Cog data at 0 and 6 months. Those undergoing clinically significant worsening on any of the four anchor questions (n=41–47) had an average ADAS-Cog change of 3.1–3.8 points. Similar results were found for the 177 patients with 6–12-month data. The average 1/2 SD for the baseline ADAS-Cog score was 3.2, and the SEM was 3.7. Conclusions 3 points decline on the ADAS-Cog may be an appropriate MCRC for clinical trials of patients with early AD. However, further studies assessing the MCRC for improvement on the ADAS-Cog, using patient-based judgement as an anchor, and determining the minimal clinically relevant difference between change on two treatments are required. Clinical trial registration number http://clinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00106899.

[1]  M. Sugishita,et al.  [Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)]. , 2011, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[2]  J. Lindesay,et al.  Determining the minimum clinically important differences for outcomes in the DOMINO trial , 2011, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[3]  D. Fergusson,et al.  Systematic Review of Measures of Clinical Significance Employed in Randomized Controlled Trials of Drugs for Dementia , 2009, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  B. Vellas,et al.  Endpoints for trials in Alzheimer's disease: a European task force consensus , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[5]  Anette Schrag,et al.  Minimal clinically important change on the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale , 2006, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[6]  D. Cella,et al.  Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  G. Norman,et al.  Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life: The Remarkable Universality of Half a Standard Deviation , 2003, Medical care.

[8]  W. Tierney,et al.  Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  K. Davis,et al.  A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. , 1984, The American journal of psychiatry.

[10]  T. Kurosaki,et al.  Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. , 1982, Journal of gerontology.

[11]  R. Hays,et al.  Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes , 2004, Quality of Life Research.