The NeOn Methodology for Ontology Engineering

In contrast to other approaches that provide methodological guidance for ontology engineering, the NeOn Methodology does not prescribe a rigid workflow, but instead it suggests a variety of pathways for developing ontologies. The nine scenarios proposed in the methodology cover commonly occurring situations, for example, when available ontologies need to be re-engineered, aligned, modularized, localized to support different languages and cultures, and integrated with ontology design patterns and non-ontological resources, such as folksonomies or thesauri. In addition, the NeOn Methodology framework provides (a) a glossary of processes and activities involved in the development of ontologies, (b) two ontology life cycle models, and (c) a set of methodological guidelines for different processes and activities, which are described (a) functionally, in terms of goals, inputs, outputs, and relevant constraints; (b) procedurally, by means of workflow specifications; and (c) empirically, through a set of illustrative examples.

[1]  M. Fernández-López,et al.  Overview of methodologies for building ontologies , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[2]  Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl,et al.  Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: A feasibility study , 2009, Data Knowl. Eng..

[3]  Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann,et al.  Reuse of terminological resources for efficient ontological engineering in Life Sciences , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[4]  Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa,et al.  NeOn methodology for building ontology networks: specification, scheduling and reuse , 2011, DISKI.

[5]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Ontological Engineering: With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web , 2004, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing.

[6]  Vasile Palade,et al.  Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing Series , 2006 .

[7]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  A network of ontology networks for building e-employment advanced systems , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Mariano Fernández-López,et al.  Ontological Engineering , 2003, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[9]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Ontology Design Patterns for Semantic Web Content , 2005, SEMWEB.

[10]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[11]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  GeoLinked data and INSPIRE through an application case , 2010, GIS '10.

[12]  E. J. Byrne A conceptual foundation for software re-engineering , 1992, Proceedings Conference on Software Maintenance 1992.

[13]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Content Ontology Design Patterns as Practical Building Blocks for Web Ontologies , 2008, ER.

[14]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  A Pattern-Based Method for Re-Engineering Non-Ontological Resources into Ontologies , 2010, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[15]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Just the right amount: extracting modules from ontologies , 2007, WWW '07.

[16]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Adam Pease,et al.  The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology: A Large Ontology for the Semantic Web and its Applic ations , 2002 .

[18]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Trends in Legal Knowledge. The Semantic Web and the Regulation of Electronic Social Systems , 2007 .

[19]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Design Patterns for Legal Ontology Constructions , 2007, LOAIT.

[20]  Aurkene Alzua-Sorzabal,et al.  Human-centric Ontology-based Context Modelling in Tourism , 2009, KEOD.

[21]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Experiments on pattern-based ontology design , 2009, K-CAP '09.

[22]  Angélica de Antonio Jiménez,et al.  A proposal for student modeling based on ontologies and diagnosis rules , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  A Context Ontology for Mobile Environments , 2010, CIAO@EKAW.