An intercomparison study of four different techniques for measuring the chemical composition of nanoparticles

Abstract. Currently, the complete chemical characterization of nanoparticles (< 100 nm) represents an analytical challenge, since these particles are abundant in number but have negligible mass. Several methods for particle-phase characterization have been recently developed to better detect and infer more accurately the sources and fates of sub-100 nm particles, but a detailed comparison of different approaches is missing. Here we report on the chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) nanoparticles from experimental studies of α-pinene ozonolysis at −50, −30, and −10 ∘C and intercompare the results measured by different techniques. The experiments were performed at the Cosmics Leaving OUtdoor Droplets (CLOUD) chamber at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN). The chemical composition was measured simultaneously by four different techniques: (1) thermal desorption–differential mobility analyzer (TD–DMA) coupled to a NO3- chemical ionization–atmospheric-pressure-interface–time-of-flight (CI–APi–TOF) mass spectrometer, (2) filter inlet for gases and aerosols (FIGAERO) coupled to an I− high-resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer (HRToF-CIMS), (3) extractive electrospray Na+ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF), and (4) offline analysis of filters (FILTER) using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) and heated electrospray ionization (HESI) coupled to an Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometer (HRMS). Intercomparison was performed by contrasting the observed chemical composition as a function of oxidation state and carbon number, by estimating the volatility and comparing the fraction of volatility classes, and by comparing the thermal desorption behavior (for the thermal desorption techniques: TD–DMA and FIGAERO) and performing positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis for the thermograms. We found that the methods generally agree on the most important compounds that are found in the nanoparticles. However, they do see different parts of the organic spectrum. We suggest potential explanations for these differences: thermal decomposition, aging, sampling artifacts, etc. We applied PMF analysis and found insights of thermal decomposition in the TD–DMA and the FIGAERO.

[1]  Stefan K. Weber,et al.  High Gas-Phase Methanesulfonic Acid Production in the OH-Initiated Oxidation of Dimethyl Sulfide at Low Temperatures , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  A. Virtanen,et al.  Comparison of saturation vapor pressures of α-pinene + O3 oxidation products derived from COSMO-RS computations and thermal desorption experiments , 2022, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[3]  U. Baltensperger,et al.  High-Frequency Gaseous and Particulate Chemical Characterization using Extractive Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (Dual-Phase-EESI-TOF) , 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[4]  L. Ahonen,et al.  Molecular characterization of ultrafine particles using extractive electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry , 2021, Environmental science: atmospheres.

[5]  M. Takeuchi,et al.  Characterization of thermal decomposition of oxygenated organic compounds in FIGAERO-CIMS , 2021, Aerosol Science and Technology.

[6]  Armin,et al.  Supplementary material to "Chemical composition of nanoparticles from α-pinene nucleation and the influence of isoprene and relative humidity at low temperature" , 2021 .

[7]  A. Virtanen,et al.  Evolution of volatility and composition in sesquiterpene-mixed and α-pinene secondary organic aerosol particles during isothermal evaporation , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[8]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Particle-phase processing of α-pinene NO3 secondary organic aerosol in the dark , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[9]  A. Prévôt,et al.  Effects of Aerosol Size and Coating Thickness on the Molecular Detection using Extractive Electrospray Ionization , 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[10]  Stefan K. Weber,et al.  Role of iodine oxoacids in atmospheric aerosol nucleation , 2021, Science.

[11]  D. van Pinxteren,et al.  Supplementary material to "Identification and Source Attribution of Organic Compounds in Ultrafine Particles near Frankfurt International Airport" , 2020 .

[12]  Stefan K. Weber,et al.  Molecular understanding of new-particle formation from α-pinene between −50 and +25 °C , 2020 .

[13]  A. Virtanen,et al.  Deconvolution of FIGAERO–CIMS thermal desorption profiles using positive matrix factorisation to identify chemical and physical processes during particle evaporation , 2020 .

[14]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Photo-oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons produces low-volatility organic compounds. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  S. Perrier,et al.  Online Aerosol Chemical Characterization by Extractive Electrospray Ionization - Ultrahigh Resolution Mass Spectrometry (EESI-Orbitrap). , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  A. Virtanen,et al.  Deconvolution of FIGAERO–CIMS thermal desorption profiles using positive matrix factorisation to identify chemical and physical processes during particle evaporation , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[17]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Molecular Composition and Volatility of Nucleated Particles from α-Pinene Oxidation between -50 °C and +25 °C. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  J. Thornton,et al.  Chamber-based insights into the factors controlling epoxydiol (IEPOX) secondary organic aerosol (SOA) yield, composition, and volatility , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[19]  J. Thornton,et al.  An extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF) for online measurement of atmospheric aerosol particles , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[20]  L. H. Ruiz,et al.  Chlorine-initiated oxidation of n-alkanes under high-NOx conditions: insights into secondary organic aerosol composition and volatility using a FIGAERO–CIMS , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[21]  J. Curtius,et al.  Size-resolved online chemical analysis of nanoaerosol particles: a thermal desorption differential mobility analyzer coupled to a chemical ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[22]  L. Ahonen,et al.  Rapid growth of organic aerosol nanoparticles over a wide tropospheric temperature range , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Impact of Thermal Decomposition on Thermal Desorption Instruments: Advantage of Thermogram Analysis for Quantifying Volatility Distributions of Organic Species. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  A. Hansel,et al.  PTR3: An Instrument for Studying the Lifecycle of Reactive Organic Carbon in the Atmosphere. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  M. Johnston,et al.  Droplet Assisted Inlet Ionization for Online Analysis of Airborne Nanoparticles. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles , 2016, Nature.

[27]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Denuder/filter sampling of organic acids and organosulfates at urban and boreal forest sites: Gas/particle distribution and possible sampling artifacts , 2016 .

[28]  D. Brus,et al.  Effect of ions on sulfuric acid‐water binary particle formation: 2. Experimental data and comparison with QC‐normalized classical nucleation theory , 2016 .

[29]  A. Hansel,et al.  Characterization of the mass-dependent transmission efficiency of a CIMS , 2015 .

[30]  J. Thornton,et al.  Constraining the sensitivity of iodide adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry to multifunctional organic molecules using the collision limit and thermodynamic stability of iodide ion adducts , 2015 .

[31]  J. Thornton,et al.  Phase partitioning and volatility of secondary organic aerosol components formed from α-pinene ozonolysis and OH oxidation: the importance of accretion products and other low volatility compounds , 2015 .

[32]  Christopher J. Hogan,et al.  Aerosol Analysis via Electrostatic Precipitation-Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[33]  João Almeida,et al.  Neutral molecular cluster formation of sulfuric acid–dimethylamine observed in real time under atmospheric conditions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  J. Thornton,et al.  An iodide-adduct high-resolution time-of-flight chemical-ionization mass spectrometer: application to atmospheric inorganic and organic compounds. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  M. Hallquist,et al.  A novel method for online analysis of gas and particle composition: description and evaluation of a Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO) , 2013 .

[36]  A. Held,et al.  A chemical analyzer for charged ultrafine particles , 2013 .

[37]  M. Johnston,et al.  Single particle chemical analysis of ambient ultrafine aerosol: A review , 2012 .

[38]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Atmospheric sulphuric acid and neutral cluster measurements using CI-APi-TOF , 2011 .

[39]  Jorge Lima,et al.  Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation , 2011, Nature.

[40]  Jared D. Smith,et al.  Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of atmospheric organic aerosol. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[41]  J. Curtius,et al.  Performance of a corona ion source for measurement of sulfuric acid by chemical ionization mass spectrometry , 2010 .

[42]  Allen L. Robinson,et al.  A two-dimensional volatility basis set: 1. organic-aerosol mixing thermodynamics , 2010 .

[43]  A. Hansel,et al.  High resolution PTR-TOF: Quantification and formula confirmation of VOC in real time , 2010, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[44]  D. J. Phares,et al.  Direct Collection of Aerosols by Electrostatic Classification for Size-Resolved Chemical Analysis , 2010 .

[45]  I. Riipinen,et al.  A semiempirical correlation between enthalpy of vaporization and saturation concentration for organic aerosol. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues , 2009 .

[47]  W. Asher,et al.  SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds , 2007 .

[48]  M. Johnston,et al.  Chemical characterization of individual, airborne sub-10-nm particles and molecules. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[49]  Allen L. Robinson,et al.  Positive and Negative Artifacts in Particulate Organic Carbon Measurements with Denuded and Undenuded Sampler Configurations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[50]  J. Smith,et al.  Thermal Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer for Ultrafine Particle Chemical Composition , 2003 .

[51]  Kenneth A. Smith,et al.  Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles , 2000 .

[52]  Reinhold Busen,et al.  First direct sulfuric acid detection in the exhaust plume of a jet aircraft in flight , 1998 .

[53]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Investigation of organic aerosol sampling artifacts in the los angeles basin , 1994 .

[54]  P. Paatero,et al.  Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values† , 1994 .

[55]  L. H. Ruiz,et al.  Chlorine-initiated oxidation of n -alkanes under high-NO x conditions: insights into secondary organic aerosol composition and volatility using a FIGAERO–CIMS , 2018 .

[56]  M. Riekkola,et al.  Aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer for measuring ultrafine aerosol particles , 2009 .

[57]  M. Riekkola,et al.  Aerosol time-of-fl ight mass spectrometer for measuring ultra fi ne aerosol particles , 2009 .

[58]  C. Enke,et al.  Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentals. , 2001, Mass spectrometry reviews.