Myofibrillar Architecture in Engineered Cardiac Myocytes

Morphogenesis is often considered a function of transcriptional synchrony and the spatial limits of diffusing mitogens; however, physical constrainment by the cell microenvironment represents an additional mechanism for regulating self-assembly of subcellular structures. We asked whether myocyte shape is a distinct signal that potentiates the organization of myofibrillar arrays in cardiac muscle myocytes. We engineered the shape of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes by culturing them on microfabricated fibronectin islands, where they spread and assumed the shape of the island. Myofibrillogenesis followed, both spatially and temporally, the assembly of unique actin networks whose architecture was predictable given the shape of the island. Subsequently, the z lines of the sarcomeres aligned and registered in distinct patterns in different regions of the myocytes in such a way that orthogonal axes of contraction could be distinctly engineered. These data suggest that physical constrainment of muscle cells by extracellular matrix may be an important regulator of myofibrillar organization.

[1]  C. Gregorio,et al.  To the heart of myofibril assembly. , 2000, Trends in cell biology.

[2]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Simple approach to micropattern cells on common culture substrates by tuning substrate wettability. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[3]  J C Perriard,et al.  Myofibrillogenesis in the developing chicken heart: assembly of Z-disk, M-line and the thick filaments. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[4]  J. Sanger,et al.  Myofibrillogenesis visualized in living embryonic cardiomyocytes. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A. Gerdes,et al.  Structural remodeling and mechanical dysfunction of cardiac myocytes in heart failure. , 1995, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[6]  Ning Wang,et al.  Directional control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces , 2002, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[7]  N. Bursac,et al.  Cardiomyocyte Cultures With Controlled Macroscopic Anisotropy: A Model for Functional Electrophysiological Studies of Cardiac Muscle , 2002, Circulation research.

[8]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[9]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Textile composites and inflatable structures , 2005 .

[10]  D. Motlagh,et al.  Form follows function: how muscle shape is regulated by work. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  W. T. Chen,et al.  Dynamic cytoskeleton-integrin associations induced by cell binding to immobilized fibronectin , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  J. Sanger,et al.  The premyofibril: evidence for its role in myofibrillogenesis. , 1994, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[13]  A. Gerdes,et al.  Transverse shape characteristics of cardiac myocytes from rats and humans. , 1994, Cardioscience.

[14]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  Sergio Pellegrino,et al.  Wrinkles in Square Membranes , 2005 .

[16]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[17]  D E Ingber,et al.  Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. , 1994, Biophysical journal.