A Simple Response Evaluation Method for Base-Isolation Building-Connection Hybrid Structural System under Long-Period and Long-Duration Ground Motion

An innovative hybrid control building system of base-isolation and building-connection has been proposed in the previous study. This system has two advantages, (i) to resist an impulsive earthquake input through the base-isolation system and (ii) to withstand a long-duration earthquake input through the building-connection system. A simple response evaluation method without the need of nonlinear time-history response analysis is proposed here for this hybrid building system under a long-period and long-duration ground motion. An analytical expression is derived in the plastic deformation of an elastic-perfectly plastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) model with viscous damping under the multi impulse which is the representative of long-period and long-duration ground motions. A transformation procedure of a base-isolation building-connection hybrid structural system into an SDOF model is proposed by introducing two steps, one is the reduction of the main base-isolated building to an SDOF system and the other is the reduction of the connecting oil dampers supported on a free wall to an oil damper with a newly introduced compensation factor on a rigid wall. Application of the analytical expression of the plastic deformation to the reduced SDOF model including the compensation factor on the connecting oil dampers enables the development of a simplified, but rather accurate response evaluation method. The time-history response analysis of the multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) model and the comparison with the proposed simplified formula make clear the accuracy and reliability of the proposed simplified response evaluation method.

[1]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Earthquake Input Energy to Two Buildings Connected by Viscous Dampers , 2007 .

[2]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Effect of Non-linearity of Connecting Dampers on Vibration Control of Connected Building Structures , 2016, Front. Built Environ..

[3]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Hybrid Control System for Greater Resilience Using Multiple Isolation and Building Connection , 2016, Front. Built Environ..

[4]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Critical Response of 2DOF Elastic–Plastic Building Structures under Double Impulse as Substitute of Near-Fault Ground Motion , 2016, Front. Built Environ..

[5]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Critical Input and Response of Elastic–Plastic Structures Under Long-Duration Earthquake Ground Motions , 2015, Front. Built Environ..

[6]  Claudio Amadio,et al.  The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non‐linear response of SDOF systems , 2003 .

[7]  I. Takewaki,et al.  Automatic generation of smart earthquake-resistant building system: Hybrid system of base-isolation and building-connection , 2016, Heliyon.

[8]  Annett Wechsler,et al.  Optimization And Anti Optimization Of Structures Under Uncertainty , 2016 .

[9]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Optimal damper placement in hybrid control system of multiple isolation and building connection , 2017 .

[10]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Smart passive control of buildings with higher redundancy and robustness using base-isolation and inter-connection , 2013 .

[11]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Robustness of base‐isolated high‐rise buildings under code‐specified ground motions , 2008 .

[12]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Critical earthquake response of a SDOF elastic‐perfectly plastic model with viscous damping under double impulse as a substitute for near‐fault ground motion , 2018 .

[13]  竹脇 出,et al.  Critical excitation methods in earthquake engineering , 2007 .

[14]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Robustness of SDOF elastoplastic structure subjected to double-impulse input under simultaneous uncertainties of yield deformation and stiffness , 2017 .

[15]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Effects of Isolation Damping on Stochastic Response of Structures with Nonlinear Base Isolators , 1998 .

[16]  Garr Gil Gast Hybrid control system , 2002 .

[17]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Bound of aspect ratio of base-isolated buildings considering nonlinear tensile behavior of rubber bearing , 2008 .

[18]  Lesley F. Wright,et al.  Information Gap Decision Theory: Decisions under Severe Uncertainty , 2004 .

[19]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  A feasibility study on smart base isolation systems using magneto-rheological elastomers , 2009 .

[20]  T. K. Datta,et al.  Nonlinear Response of Torsionally Coupled Base Isolated Structure , 1994 .

[21]  John F. Hall,et al.  The role of damping in seismic isolation , 1999 .

[22]  Luigi Petti,et al.  SMALL SCALE EXPERIMENTAL TESTING TO VERIFY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BASE ISOLATION AND TUNED MASS DAMPERS COMBINED CONTROL STRATEGY , 2010 .

[23]  Marvin W. Halling,et al.  Near-Source Ground Motion and its Effects on Flexible Buildings , 1995 .

[24]  D. Wald,et al.  Response of High-Rise and Base-Isolated Buildings to a Hypothetical Mw 7.0 Blind Thrust Earthquake , 1995, Science.

[25]  Katsuhiro KAMAE,et al.  STRONG GROUND MOTION PREDICTION FOR HUGE SUBDUCTION EARTHQUAKES USING A CHARACTERIZED SOURCE MODEL AND SEVERAL SIMULATION TECHNIQUES , 2002 .

[26]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Robustness Evaluation of Elastoplastic Base-Isolated High-Rise Buildings Subjected to Critical Double Impulse , 2017, Front. Built Environ..

[27]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures , 1999 .

[28]  C. A. Morales,et al.  Transmissibility concept to control base motion in isolated structures , 2003 .

[29]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Base isolation for near‐fault motions , 2001 .

[30]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Critical Earthquake Response of Elastic–Plastic Structures Under Near-Fault Ground Motions (Part 1: Fling-Step Input) , 2015, Front. Built Environ..

[31]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Dual Control High-rise Building for Robuster Earthquake Performance , 2017, Front. Built Environ..

[32]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  CRITICAL EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF ELASTIC-PLASTIC STRUCTURES WITH NONLINEAR VISCOUS DAMPING UNDER DOUBLE IMPULSE AS SUBSTITUTE FOR NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTION , 2018 .

[33]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Dynamic response of adjacent structures connected by friction damper , 2011 .

[34]  Hong-Nan Li,et al.  Limitations of height-to-width ratio for base-isolated buildings under earthquake , 2006 .

[35]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Uncertain-parameter sensitivity of earthquake input energy to base-isolated structure , 2005 .

[36]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Resonant behaviour of base‐isolated high‐rise buildings under long‐period ground motions , 2006 .

[37]  A S Veletsos,et al.  Deformation Spectra for Elastic and Elastoplastic Systems Subjected to Ground Shock and Earthquake Motions , 1965 .

[38]  A. Reinhorn,et al.  Overview of the Resilience Concept , 2006 .

[39]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Earthquake input energy to tall and base‐isolated buildings in time and frequency dual domains , 2009 .

[40]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Improving the Earthquake Resilience of Buildings: The worst case approach , 2012 .

[41]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Uncertainties in long-period ground motion and its impact on building structural design: Case study of the 2011 Tohoku (Japan) earthquake , 2013 .

[42]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake and response of high-rise buildings under long-period ground motions , 2011 .

[43]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Critical Steady-State Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Bilinear Hysteretic System under Multi Impulse as Substitute of Long-Duration Ground Motion , 2017, Front. Built Environ..

[44]  Turan Karabork,et al.  Performance of multi-storey structures with high damping rubber bearing base isolation systems , 2011 .