Modeling Learner Affect with Theoretically Grounded Dynamic Bayesian Networks

Evidence of the strong relationship between learning and emotion has fueled recent work in modeling affective states in intelligent tutoring systems. Many of these models are based on general models of affect without a specific focus on learner emotions. This paper presents work that investigates the benefits of using theoretical models of learner emotions to guide the development of Bayesian networks for prediction of student affect. Predictive models are empirically learned from data acquired from 260 students interacting with the game-based learning environment, CRYSTAL ISLAND. Results indicate the benefits of using theoretical models of learner emotions to inform predictive models. The most successful model, a dynamic Bayesian network, also highlights the importance of temporal information in predicting learner emotions. This work demonstrates the benefits of basing predictive models of learner emotions on theoretical foundations and has implications for how these models may be used to validate theoretical models of emotion.

[1]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[2]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics , 2009, Cognitive Systems Research.

[3]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Caring for agents and agents that care: building empathic relations with synthetic agents , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[4]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  Emotion Sensors Go To School , 2009, AIED.

[5]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Emotion in Education , 2007 .

[6]  Nadia Garnefski,et al.  Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire - development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). , 2006 .

[7]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[8]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  Helen Pain,et al.  Informing the Detection of the Students' Motivational State: An Empirical Study , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[10]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Affective Learning — A Manifesto , 2004 .

[11]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life , 1997 .

[12]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor , 2004 .

[13]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Emotion in the Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Achievement Motivation , 2007 .

[14]  Joar Vittersø Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Finding Flow. The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life , 2000 .

[15]  A. Elliot,et al.  A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion , 2001, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[17]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features , 2010, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[18]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[19]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Affective learning companions: strategies for empathetic agents with real-time multimodal affective sensing to foster meta-cognitive and meta-affective approaches to learning, motivation, and perseverance , 2006 .

[20]  James C. Lester,et al.  Early Prediction of Student Frustration , 2007, ACII.

[21]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect , 2009, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[22]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective , 2005 .

[23]  James C. Lester,et al.  Evaluating the consequences of affective feedback in intelligent tutoring systems , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops.