Parameter space warping: shape-based correspondence between morphologically different objects

This paper presents a novel and comprehensive method for the automated determination of correspondences between two morphologically different two-dimensional (2-D) or three-dimensional (3-D) objects. Correspondences are determined by warping parametric representations of the objects to be matched. The warp is guided by the minimization of a similarity criterion function that measures features related to structural correspondence, including Euclidian point-to-point distance and differences in normals and curvature. The method uses a continuous harmonic parameterization for both the object and the warp, which provides: 1) a high degree of computational efficiency; 2) robust extraction of differential features, not subject to discretization errors or noise amplification in differentiation; 3) direct formulation of constraints to avoid overlaps in the resulting correspondence set; and 4) a scale-space paradigm of object shape and warp. The new method does not search for individual landmarks, but operates with a complete, integrated representation of the object geometry. The method was tested on 2-D and 3-D objects with substantial shape differences. Results demonstrated substantial improvements of 2%-33% in correspondence accuracy and 15%-59% in correspondence quality compared with direct registration methods.

[1]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Quantitative follow‐up of patients with multiple sclerosis using MRI: Technical aspects , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  Patrick Clarysse,et al.  Tracking geometrical descriptors on 3-D deformable surfaces: application to the left-ventricular surface of the heart , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Segmentation of 2-D and 3-D objects from MRI volume data using constrained elastic deformations of flexible Fourier contour and surface models , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  David Metcalf,et al.  A Digital Brain Atlas for Surgical Planning, Model-Driven Segmentation, and Teaching , 1996, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[6]  Noboru Niki,et al.  A comparison of Hopfield neural network and Boltzmann machine in segmenting MR images of the brain , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[7]  John A. Sweeney,et al.  Superior temporal gyrus and the course of early schizophrenia: progressive, static, or reversible? , 1998, Journal of psychiatric research.

[8]  J. Meinguet Multivariate interpolation at arbitrary points made simple , 1979 .

[9]  Jorge S. Marques,et al.  A class of probabilistic shape models , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Rigid point feature registration using mutual information , 1999, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  Elastically Deforming 3D Atlas to Match Anatomical Brain Images , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  A surface-based technique for warping three-dimensional images of the brain , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[13]  G H Whitehouse,et al.  Automatic analysis of cerebral atrophy. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  James C. Gee,et al.  On matching brain volumes , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Modeling, Analysis, and Visualization of Left Ventricle Shape and Motion by Hierarchical Decomposition , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  High-Dimensional Image Registration Using Symmetric Priors , 1999, NeuroImage.

[17]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  Stephan Heckers,et al.  A Method for Assessing the Accuracy of Intersubject Registration of the Human Brain Using Anatomic Landmarks , 1999, NeuroImage.

[19]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Creation and use of a Talairach‐compatible atlas for accurate, automated, nonlinear intersubject registration, and analysis of functional imaging data , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[20]  G. Pearlson,et al.  Longitudinal change in basal ganglia volume in patients with Huntington's disease , 1997, Neurology.

[21]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Boundary Finding with Parametrically Deformable Models , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[22]  A. Toga,et al.  Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis of Sulcal Variability in the Human Brain , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Johan Montagnat,et al.  A hybrid framework for surface registration and deformable models , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[24]  A. Khotanzad,et al.  A physics-based coordinate transformation for 3-D image matching , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  D'arcy W. Thompson On Growth and Form , 1945 .

[26]  F. Bookstein Chapter 10 – Linear Methods for Nonlinear Maps: Procrustes Fits, Thin-Plate Splines, and the Biometric Analysis of Shape Variability , 1999 .

[27]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[28]  Stanley M. Dunn,et al.  3D registration of surfaces for change detection in medical images , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[29]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Modal Matching for Correspondence and Recognition , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[30]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[31]  K H Shin,et al.  Surface matching of multimodality image volumes by a fuzzy elastic registration technique. , 1998, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[32]  Hemant D. Tagare,et al.  Shape-based nonrigid correspondence with application to heart motion analysis , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  J. Thompson,et al.  MOVPE growth for the fabrication of OEICs , 1992 .

[34]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Dynamic 3D Models with Local and Global Deformations: Deformable Superquadrics , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[35]  Matthias Eck,et al.  Automatic reconstruction of B-spline surfaces of arbitrary topological type , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[36]  Lawrence H. Staib,et al.  Shape-based 3D surface correspondence using geodesics and local geometry , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[37]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[38]  Richard A. Baldock,et al.  Robust Point Correspondence Applied to Two-and Three-Dimensional Image Registration , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[39]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Point-tracked quantitative analysis of left ventricular surface motion from 3-D image sequences , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Dmitry B. Goldgof,et al.  The Use of Three- and Four-Dimensional Surface Harmonics for Rigid and Nonrigid Shape Recovery and Representation , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[41]  D'arcy W. Thompson,et al.  On Growth and Form , 1917, Nature.

[42]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Anatomically Driven Strategies for High-Dimensional Brain Image Warping and Pathology Detection , 1999 .

[43]  Eric Mjolsness,et al.  New Algorithms for 2D and 3D Point Matching: Pose Estimation and Correspondence , 1998, NIPS.

[44]  Yakup Paker,et al.  Three-dimensional object metamorphosis through energy minimization , 1998, Comput. Graph..

[45]  U. Grenander,et al.  Statistical methods in computational anatomy , 1997, Statistical methods in medical research.