Validation of surface height from shuttle radar topography mission using shuttle laser altimeter

Spaceborne Interferometric SAR (InSAR) technology used in the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and spaceborne lidar such as Shuttle Laser Altimeter-02 (SLA-02) are two promising technologies for providing global scale digital elevation models (DEMs). Each type of these systems has limitations that affect the accuracy or extent of coverage. These systems are complementary in developing DEM data. In this study, surface height measured independently by SRTM and SLA-02 was cross-validated. SLA data was first verified by field observations, and examinations of individual lidar waveforms. The geolocation accuracy of the SLA height data sets was examined by checking the correlation between the SLA surface height with SRTM height at 90 m resolution, while shifting the SLA ground track within its specified horizontal errors. It was found that the heights from the two instruments were highly correlated along the SLA ground track, and shifting the positions did not improve the correlation significantly. Absolute surface heights from SRTM and SLA referenced to the same horizontal and vertical datum (World Geodetic System (WGS) 84 Ellipsoid) were compared. The effects of forest cover and surface slope on the height difference were also examined. After removing the forest effect on SRTM height, the mean height difference with SLA-02 was near zero. It can be further inferred from the standard deviation of the height differences that the absolute accuracy of SRTM height at low vegetation area is better than the SRTM mission specifications (16 m). The SRTM height bias caused by forest cover needs to be further examined using future spaceborne lidar (e.g. GLAS) data.

[1]  Guoqing Sun,et al.  Modeling lidar returns from forest canopies , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Mark D. Semon,et al.  POSTUSE REVIEW: An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements , 1982 .

[3]  Charles Werner,et al.  Accuracy of topographic maps derived from ERS-1 interferometric radar , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[5]  W. Cohen,et al.  Integration of lidar and Landsat ETM+ data for estimating and mapping forest canopy height , 2002 .

[6]  Richard M. Goldstein,et al.  Studies of multibaseline spaceborne interferometric synthetic aperture radars , 1990 .

[7]  W. Cohen,et al.  An evaluation of alternate remote sensing products for forest inventory, monitoring, and mapping of Douglas-fir forests in western Oregon , 2001 .

[8]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar , 2002 .

[9]  Jakob van Zyl,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM): a breakthrough in remote sensing of topography , 2001 .

[10]  D. Harding,et al.  Observations of the Earth's topography from the Shuttle Laser Altimeter (SLA): Laser-pulse Echo-recovery measurements of terrestrial surfaces , 1998 .

[11]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice, Atmosphere, Ocean, and Land , 2002 .

[12]  Scott B. Luthcke,et al.  Enhanced geolocation of spaceborne laser altimeter surface returns: parameter calibration from the simultaneous reduction of altimeter range and navigation tracking data , 2002 .

[13]  J. Taylor.  An Introduction to Error Analysis , 1982 .

[14]  B. Law,et al.  Structure‐based forest biomass from fusion of radar and hyperspectral observations , 2003 .

[15]  K. Ranson,et al.  Characterization of Forests in Western Sayani Mountains, Siberia from SIR-C SAR Data , 2001 .

[16]  K. Ranson,et al.  Requirement of Ground Tie Points for InSAR DEM Generation , 2000 .

[17]  D. Rowlands,et al.  Improvements In Spaceborne Laser Altimeter Data Geolocation , 2001 .

[18]  M. Moghaddam,et al.  Vegetation characteristics and underlying topography from interferometric radar , 1996 .

[19]  K. Clint Slatton,et al.  Fusing interferometric radar and laser altimeter data to estimate surface topography and vegetation heights , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[20]  J. Blair,et al.  The Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor: a medium-altitude, digitisation-only, airborne laser altimeter for mapping vegetation and topography , 1999 .

[21]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96 , 1998 .

[22]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[23]  Ralph Dubayah,et al.  Validation of Vegetation Canopy Lidar sub-canopy topography measurements for a dense tropical forest , 2002 .

[24]  Guoqing Sun,et al.  Radiometric slope correction for forest biomass estimation from SAR data in the Western Sayani Mountains, Siberia , 2002 .

[25]  S. Roberts,et al.  Influence of Fusing Lidar and Multispectral Imagery on Remotely Sensed Estimates of Stand Density and Mean Tree Height in a Managed Loblolly Pine Plantation , 2003, Forest Science.