Two axiomatic characterizations for the system of spheres-based (and the Epistemic Entrenchment-based) multiple contractions

In some recent works (Reis 2011, Fermé and Reis, J. Philos. Log. 41, 29–52, 2012, Fermé and Reis, Rev. Symb. Log. 6, 460–487, 2013) two new kinds of multiple contraction functions have been proposed, namely the system of spheres-based multiple contractions and the epistemic entrenchment-based multiple contractions, as generalizations (to the case of multiple contraction) of the well-known classes of systems of spheres-based and of epistemic entrenchment-based (singleton) contractions. Additionally, a representation theorem for the class of epistemic entrenchment-based multiple contraction has been proposed, and it has been shown that the two newly proposed constructions are equivalent, in the sense that a multiple contraction function is a system of spheres-based multiple contraction if and only if it is an epistemic entrenchment-based multiple contraction. In this paper we present two axiomatic characterizations for those multiple contraction functions which differ from the one mentioned above and, in particular, make use of some more intuitive postulates.

[1]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Revisions of Knowledge Systems Using Epistemic Entrenchment , 1988, TARK.

[2]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  A textbook of belief dynamics - theory change and database updating , 1999, Applied logic series.

[3]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[4]  Adam J. Grove,et al.  Two modellings for theory change , 1988, J. Philos. Log..

[5]  Reinhard Niederée Multiple contraction. A further case against Gärdenfors' principle of recovery , 1989, The Logic of Theory Change.

[6]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States , 2008 .

[7]  Eduardo L. Fermé,et al.  System of Spheres-based Multiple Contractions , 2011, J. Philos. Log..

[8]  Eduardo L. Fermé,et al.  EPISTEMIC ENTRENCHMENT-BASED MULTIPLE CONTRACTIONS , 2013, The Review of Symbolic Logic.

[9]  P G rdenfors,et al.  Knowledge in flux: modeling the dynamics of epistemic states , 1988 .

[10]  Sven Ove Hansson Decomposition of multiple AGM contraction: possibility and impossibility results , 2014, Log. J. IGPL.

[11]  Maurício D. Luís Reis,et al.  On the interrelation between systems of spheres and epistemic entrenchment relations , 2014, Log. J. IGPL.

[12]  André Fuhrmann,et al.  A survey of multiple contractions , 1994, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[13]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  New operators for theory change , 2008 .

[14]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  A survey of multiple contraction , 1994 .

[15]  André Fuhrmann,et al.  Relevant logics, modal logics and theory change , 1988 .

[16]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  A Textbook Of Belief Dynamics , 1999 .

[17]  Mary-Anne Williams,et al.  Constructive Modelings for Theory Change , 1995, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..