Chlorhexidine Coated Polyglactin Sutures In Prevention Of Surgical Site Infection

Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) are one of the most common complications of any intervention in themaxillofacial region. Most of the times sutures used for woundapproximation act as anidus of bacterial accumulation and subsequent infection due to the presence of scores of microbes in and around the oral cavity. This has been attributed to the wicking action associated with braided sutures. Various methods to prevent surgical site infections are reported in literature, the most recent being use of antibacterial coated sutures. Sutures are either coated with triclosan or chlorhexidine or a combination of antimicrobial agents and fatty acids. These sutures are known to have a significant role in the prevention of SSIs elsewhere in the body, but the role in oral cavity remains questionable. This study aims to establish the role of chlorhexidine coated sutures in the prevention of surgical site infections if any. Chlorhexidine-coated and uncoated suturematerials were used in 17 patients undergoing third molar extractions. Seven days post-operatively the sutures were removed, and bacteria were isolated. Following which colony-forming units (CFU/ml)were counted. Concerning the total number of oral pathogens, that adhered to suturematerial, no reductionwas demonstrated for Chlorhexidine coated sutures. The use of chlorhexidine-coated suture material offers no advantage in intraoral surgery.

[1]  C. Edmiston,et al.  The role of antimicrobial sutures in preventing surgical site infection , 2017, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[2]  I. Naseem,et al.  Biosmart Materials the future of Dentistry: A Review , 2016 .

[3]  K. Sethi,et al.  Comparative evaluation of sutures coated with triclosan and chlorhexidine for oral biofilm inhibition potential and antimicrobial activity against periodontal pathogens: An in vitro study , 2016, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[4]  T. Karpiński,et al.  Chlorhexidine--pharmaco-biological activity and application. , 2015, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[5]  G. Rajasekhar,et al.  Polyglactin 910 vs. Triclosan Coated Polyglactin 910 In Oral Surgery: A Comparative In Vivo Study , 2014 .

[6]  Bruce Y. Lee,et al.  An Economic Model: Value of Antimicrobial-Coated Sutures to Society, Hospitals, and Third-Party Payers in Preventing Abdominal Surgical Site Infections , 2014, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[7]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Novel High Efficient Coatings for Anti-Microbial Surgical Sutures Using Chlorhexidine in Fatty Acid Slow-Release Carrier Systems , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  M. Cruz,et al.  Sutures coated with antiseptic pomade to prevent bacterial colonization: a randomized clinical trial. , 2013, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[9]  S. Rothenburger,et al.  Antimicrobial sutures and prevention of surgical site infection: assessment of the safety of the antiseptic triclosan , 2011, International wound journal.

[10]  A. Kramer,et al.  Healthcare associated infection: novel strategies and antimicrobial implants to prevent surgical site infection. , 2010, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[11]  J. Ogier,et al.  Antibacterial protection of suture material by chlorhexidine-functionalized polyelectrolyte multilayer films , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[12]  M. Köller,et al.  Effect on infection resistance of a local antiseptic and antibiotic coating on osteosynthesis implants: An in vitro and in vivo study , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  K. Pelz,et al.  Bacterial colonization on different suture materials--a potential risk for intraoral dentoalveolar surgery. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[14]  Marlene R. Miller,et al.  Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. , 2003, JAMA.

[15]  G. Pugliese,et al.  Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms , 2002, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[16]  R. Darouiche,et al.  Anti-Infective Efficacy of Antiseptic-Coated Intramedullary Nails*† , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  R. Arnold,et al.  A clinical study of bacterial contamination of chlorhexidine-coated filaments of an interdental brush. , 1998, The Journal of clinical dentistry.

[18]  D. Laskin,et al.  Suture removal-induced bacteremia: a possible endocarditis risk. , 1992, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[19]  J. Crawford,et al.  Bacteremia following intraoral suture removal. , 1988, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[20]  K. Pelz,et al.  Anaerobic bacteremia following tooth extraction and removal of osteosynthesis plates. , 1987, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[21]  O. Fardal,et al.  A review of the literature on use of chlorhexidine in dentistry. , 1986, Journal of the American Dental Association.