Biomonitors of stream quality in agricultural areas: Fish versus invertebrates

Although the utility of using either fish or benthic invertebrates as biomonitors of stream quality has been clearly shown, there is little comparative information on the usefulness of the groups in any particular situation. We compared fish to invertebrate assemblages in their ability to reflect habitat quality of sediment-impacted streams in agricultural regions of northeast Missouri, USA. Habitat quality was measured by a combination of substrate composition, riparian type, buffer strip width, and land use. Invertebrates were more sensitive to habitat differences when structural measurements, species diversity and ordination, were used. Incorporating ecological measurements, by using the Index of Biological Integrity, increased the information obtained from the fish assemblage. The differential response of the two groups was attributed to the more direct impact of sediments on invertebrate life requisites; the impact of sedimentation on fish is considered more indirect and complex, affecting feeding and reproductive mechanisms.

[1]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Multivariate analysis in community ecology , 1984 .

[2]  J. Wilhm,et al.  Biological Parameters for Water Quality Criteria , 1968 .

[3]  J. Culp,et al.  Reciprocal Averaging and Polar Ordination as Techniques for Analyzing Lotic Macroinvertebrate Communities , 1980 .

[4]  N. M. Fenneman.  Physiography of eastern United States , 1938 .

[5]  Seth R. Reice,et al.  The Role of Substratum in Benthic Macroinvertebrate Microdistribution and Litter Decomposition in a Woodland Stream , 1980 .

[6]  Philip Wayne Smith,et al.  Illinois Streams: A Classification Based on Their Fishes and an Analysis of Factors Responsible for Disappearance of Native Species , 2011 .

[7]  T. H. Langlois.  Two Processes Operating for the Reduction in Abundance or Elimination of Fish Species from Certain Types of Water Areas , 1941 .

[8]  E. Balon,et al.  Reproductive Guilds of Fishes: A Proposal and Definition , 1975 .

[9]  J. R. Chandler.  A biological Approach to water quality management , 1970 .

[10]  A. N. Strahler.  Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[11]  James R. Karr,et al.  Regional Application of an Index of Biotic Integrity Based on Stream Fish Communities , 1984 .

[12]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Water Resources and the Land-Water Interface , 1978, Science.

[13]  J. R. Stauffer,et al.  Biological monitoring of fish , 1980 .

[14]  J. Karr.  Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities , 1981 .

[15]  M. O. Hill,et al.  DECORANA - A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. , 1979 .

[16]  M. Hill,et al.  Reciprocal Averaging : an eigenvector method of ordination , 1973 .

[17]  R. Green,et al.  Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists , 1979 .

[18]  Almo J. Cordone,et al.  THE INFLUENCES OF INORGANIC SEDIMENT ON THE AQUATIC LIFE OF 'STREAMS , 1960 .

[19]  W. C. Starrett.  Food Relationships of the Minnows of the Des Moines River, Iowa , 1950 .

[20]  V. Resh,et al.  Substrate Relationships, Spatial Distribution Patterns, and Sampling Variability in a Stream Caddisfly Population , 1979 .

[21]  G. W. Minshall,et al.  Factors affecting microdistribution of stream benthic insects , 1977 .

[22]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Comparison of Ordination Techniques , 1972 .

[23]  P. Nuttall,et al.  The effect of China-clay wastes on stream invertebrates , 1973 .