Perceptions of advantages and barriers to radial-access percutaneous coronary intervention in VA cardiac catheterization laboratories.

[1]  J. Messenger,et al.  The Learning Curve for Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Operators in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2014, Circulation.

[2]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Adoption of Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Outcomes According to Center Radial Volume in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  John C. Messenger,et al.  Adoption of Radial Access and Comparison of Outcomes to Femoral Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007–2012) , 2013, Circulation.

[4]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Radial First: Paradox+Proficiency=Opportunity , 2013, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[5]  James Brian Byrd,et al.  Data quality of an electronic health record tool to support VA cardiac catheterization laboratory quality improvement: the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking System for Cath Labs (CART) program. , 2013, American heart journal.

[6]  P. Gao,et al.  Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  Karim Ratib,et al.  Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study. , 2012, American heart journal.

[8]  Lawrence Joseph,et al.  Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. , 2012, American heart journal.

[9]  J. Tremmel,et al.  Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: Executive summary by the transradial committee of the SCAI , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[10]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[11]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Stephan D. Fihn,et al.  Strategies from a Nationwide Health Information Technology Implementation: The VA CART STORY , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[13]  J. Coppola,et al.  Transradial cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: a review , 2009, Coronary artery disease.

[14]  J. Tremmel.  Launching a successful transradial program. , 2009, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[15]  Fang-Shu Ou,et al.  Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  Harlan M. Krumholz,et al.  Achieving Rapid Door-To-Balloon Times: How Top Hospitals Improve Complex Clinical Systems , 2006, Circulation.

[17]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Achieving door-to-balloon times that meet quality guidelines: how do successful hospitals do it? , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  A. Edmondson.  Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams , 2003 .

[20]  H. Krumholz,et al.  A qualitative study of increasing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction: Why do some hospitals succeed? , 2001, JAMA.

[21]  H. Krumholz,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Increasing β-Blocker Use After Myocardial Infarction: Why Do Some Hospitals Succeed? , 2001 .

[22]  D. Cohen,et al.  Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison. , 1999, American heart journal.

[23]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Learning curve in the use of the radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[24]  M. Morice,et al.  Radial approach: what about the learning curve? , 1997, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[25]  G. Laarman,et al.  A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.