Effect of the damper property variability on the seismic reliability of linear systems equipped with viscous dampers

Abstract Viscous dampers are dissipation devices widely employed for seismic structural control. To date, the performance of systems equipped with viscous dampers has been extensively analysed only by employing deterministic approaches. However, these approaches neglect the response dispersion due to the uncertainties in the input as well as the variability of the system properties. Some recent works have highlighted the important role of these seismic input uncertainties in the seismic performance of linear and nonlinear viscous dampers. This study analyses the effect of the variability of damper properties on the probabilistic system response and risk. In particular, the paper aims at evaluating the impact of the tolerance allowed in devices’ quality control and production tests in terms of variation of the exceedance probabilities of the Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) which are most relevant for the seismic performance. A preliminary study is carried out to relate the variability of the constitutive damper characteristics to the tolerance limit allowed in tests and to evaluate the consequences on the device’s dissipation properties. In the subsequent part of the study, the sensitivity of the dynamic response is analysed by harmonic analysis. Finally, the seismic response sensitivity is studied by evaluating the influence of the allowed variability of the constitutive damper characteristics on the response hazard curves, providing the exceedance probability per year of EDPs. A set of linear elastic systems with different dynamic properties, equipped with linear and nonlinear dampers, are considered in the analyses, and subset simulation is employed together with the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to achieve a confident estimate of small exceedance probabilities.

[1]  F. Mazzolani,et al.  Design of Steel Structures for Buildings in Seismic Areas: Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1-1 - General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings , 2017 .

[2]  Laura Ragni,et al.  Influence of the nonlinear behavior of viscous dampers on the seismic demand hazard of building frames , 2016 .

[3]  Charles F. Richter,et al.  Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration(Second paper) , 1956 .

[4]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[5]  Andrea Dall'Asta,et al.  Performance-based seismic risk assessment for buildings equipped with linear and nonlinear viscous dampers , 2014 .

[6]  Gary F. Dargush,et al.  Multi-Objective Evolutionary Seismic Design with Passive Energy Dissipation Systems , 2009 .

[7]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation , 2005 .

[8]  Andrea Dall'Asta,et al.  Probabilistic seismic response assessment of linear systems equipped with nonlinear viscous dampers , 2015 .

[9]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional Analysis of Rigid-Plastic and Elastoplastic Structures under Pulse-Type Excitations , 2004 .

[10]  G. Atkinson,et al.  STOCHASTIC MODELING OF CALIFORNIAN GROUND MOTIONS , 2000 .

[11]  N. Null.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[12]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Assessment of capacity design of columns in steel moment resisting frames with viscous dampers , 2016 .

[13]  S. Infanti.  RION-ANTIRION BRIDGE: DESIGN AND FULL-SCALE TESTING OF THE SEISMIC PROTECTION DEVICES , 2004 .

[14]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics , 2010 .

[15]  Oded Amir,et al.  Towards realistic minimum-cost optimization of viscous fluid dampers for seismic retrofitting , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[16]  David M. Boore,et al.  Site amplifications for generic rock sites , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[17]  N. Null.  Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings , 2014 .

[18]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Seismic performance and probabilistic collapse resistance assessment of steel moment resisting frames with fluid viscous dampers , 2014 .

[19]  Andrea Dall'Asta,et al.  Sensitivity-based study of the influence of brace over-strength distributions on the seismic response of steel frames with BRBs , 2012 .

[20]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Response of Nonstructural Components in Structures with Damping Systems , 2006 .

[21]  Fatemeh Jalayer,et al.  Effects of two alternative representations of ground‐motion uncertainty on probabilistic seismic demand assessment of structures , 2008 .

[22]  David M. Boore,et al.  Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method , 2003 .

[23]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  A comparison of intensity‐based demand distributions and the seismic demand hazard for seismic performance assessment , 2013 .

[24]  Edward Cohen,et al.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 1990 .

[25]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Performance assessment and optimization of fluid viscous dampers through life-cycle cost criteria and comparison to alternative design approaches , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[26]  Enrico Tubaldi,et al.  Nonstationary stochastic response of structural systems equipped with nonlinear viscous dampers under seismic excitation , 2015 .

[27]  Andrea Dall'Asta,et al.  Efficient Approach for the Reliability-Based Design of Linear Damping Devices for Seismic Protection of Buildings , 2016 .

[28]  Keith Porter,et al.  An Overview of PEER's Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology , 2003 .

[29]  Oren Lavan,et al.  Seismic behavior of viscously damped yielding frames under structural and damping uncertainties , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[30]  Dimitris Diamantidis,et al.  The Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS) Probabilistic Model Code for New and Existing Structures , 1999 .

[31]  Michele Barbato,et al.  Influence of Model Parameter Uncertainty on Seismic Transverse Response and Vulnerability of Steel–Concrete Composite Bridges with Dual Load Path , 2012 .

[32]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Investigation of Seismic Response of Buildings with Linear and Nonlinear Fluid Viscous Dampers , 1997 .

[33]  Joseph M. Bracci,et al.  Uncertainty modeling in earthquake engineering , 2003 .

[34]  Charles F. Richter,et al.  Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration , 1942 .

[35]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Seismic structural and non-structural performance evaluation of highly damped self-centering and conventional systems , 2011 .

[36]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Experimental & Analytical Investigation of Seismic Response of Structures With Supplemental Fluid Viscous Dampers , 1992 .

[37]  P. Franchin,et al.  Seismic Reliability Analysis of Structures , 2004 .

[38]  James L. Beck,et al.  SUBSET SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION TO SEISMIC RISK BASED ON DYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 2003 .