Abstract The starting point of this paper is the problem of how STS researchers make the objects of their research, considering that researchers are an integral part of the practices through which their research objects are made. A “center of coordination” in an airport is used as an example to show how a schedule, used as an ordering device within the ongoing work, operates at the same time as a form of normative prescription for what the work should come to. The schedule demonstrates how prescriptive representations presuppose the work of their enactment, in ways that differ from representations used to describe “natural” events, insofar as the former are constitutive of the processes and practices to which the artifacts are accountable. Finally the paper draws on the work of John Law (2004) to show how consistent relations, i.e. orderings, are maintained through routines that, in producing other relations, constitute mess. In this respect, the order created by the researcher in analyzing the situated use of the schedule is not different in kind from the order created by the members’ practices to manage the traffic of planes. Keywords Apparatus; center of coordination; normative prescriptions; order/mess; practice.
[1]
L. Sproull,et al.
Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management
,
1990
.
[2]
L. Suchman.
Centers of coordination : a case and some themes.
,
1997
.
[3]
Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.
Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society
,
1989
.
[4]
Mary Elizabeth Lynch,et al.
The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences
,
1988
.
[5]
Susan Leigh Star,et al.
Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work
,
1999,
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
[6]
M. Foucault,et al.
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
,
1978
.
[7]
H. Garfinkel.
Ethnomethodology's program
,
2002
.
[8]
R. D'amico.
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
,
1978,
Telos.
[9]
B. Latour.
Visualization and cognition: thinking with eyes and hands
,
1986
.
[10]
J. Law.
After Method: Mess in Social Science Research
,
2004
.
[11]
B. Latour.
Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society
,
1989
.