Behavioral, Modeling, and Electrophysiological Evidence for Supramodality in Human Metacognition

Human metacognition, or the capacity to introspect on one's own mental states, has been mostly characterized through confidence reports in visual tasks. A pressing question is to what extent results from visual studies generalize to other domains. Answering this question allows determining whether metacognition operates through shared, supramodal mechanisms or through idiosyncratic, modality-specific mechanisms. Here, we report three new lines of evidence for decisional and postdecisional mechanisms arguing for the supramodality of metacognition. First, metacognitive efficiency correlated among auditory, tactile, visual, and audiovisual tasks. Second, confidence in an audiovisual task was best modeled using supramodal formats based on integrated representations of auditory and visual signals. Third, confidence in correct responses involved similar electrophysiological markers for visual and audiovisual tasks that are associated with motor preparation preceding the perceptual judgment. We conclude that the supramodality of metacognition relies on supramodal confidence estimates and decisional signals that are shared across sensory modalities. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Metacognitive monitoring is the capacity to access, report, and regulate one's own mental states. In perception, this allows rating our confidence in what we have seen, heard, or touched. Although metacognitive monitoring can operate on different cognitive domains, we ignore whether it involves a single supramodal mechanism common to multiple cognitive domains or modality-specific mechanisms idiosyncratic to each domain. Here, we bring evidence in favor of the supramodality hypothesis by showing that participants with high metacognitive performance in one modality are likely to perform well in other modalities. Based on computational modeling and electrophysiology, we propose that supramodality can be explained by the existence of supramodal confidence estimates and by the influence of decisional cues on confidence estimates.

[1]  Dawa T. Phillips,et al.  Domain-specific enhancement of metacognitive ability following meditation training. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Timothy J. Pleskac,et al.  Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. , 2010, Psychological review.

[3]  D. Bates,et al.  Parsimonious Mixed Models , 2015, 1506.04967.

[4]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Marta Siedlecka,et al.  But I Was So Sure! Metacognitive Judgments Are Less Accurate Given Prospectively than Retrospectively , 2016, Frontiers in Psychology.

[7]  Nathaniel D. Daw,et al.  Self-Evaluation of Decision-Making: A General Bayesian Framework for Metacognitive Computation , 2017, Psychological review.

[8]  M. Linkie,et al.  Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data , 2009 .

[9]  A. Mognon,et al.  ADJUST: An automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[10]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  Nick Yeung,et al.  Shared Neural Markers of Decision Confidence and Error Detection , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The Role of Alpha-Band Brain Oscillations as a Sensory Suppression Mechanism during Selective Attention , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[13]  Natika Newton,et al.  Metacognition and consciousness , 1995 .

[14]  Peter D. Kvam,et al.  Interference effects of choice on confidence: Quantum characteristics of evidence accumulation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  G. Pfurtscheller Event-related synchronization (ERS): an electrophysiological correlate of cortical areas at rest. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[17]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Confidence as a Common Currency between Vision and Audition , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  Hakwan Lau,et al.  There are things that we know that we know, and there are things that we do not know we do not know: Confidence in decision-making , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[19]  R. Gregory The Most Expensive Painting in the World , 2007, Perception.

[20]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Does Confidence Use a Common Currency Across Two Visual Tasks? , 2014, Psychological science.

[21]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  Henrik Singmann,et al.  afex – Analysis of Factorial EXperiments , 2015 .

[23]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Relating Introspective Accuracy to Individual Differences in Brain Structure , 2010, Science.

[24]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  R. Dolan,et al.  Metacognition: computation, biology and function , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Parieto‐occipital ∼1 0Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms , 1998 .

[27]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[29]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data , 1995, NIPS.

[30]  Jonathan S. Lefcheck,et al.  piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics , 2015, 1509.01845.

[31]  Ophelia Deroy,et al.  Metacognition in Multisensory Perception , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Dorothy V. M. Bishop,et al.  Journal of Neuroscience Methods , 2015 .

[33]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[35]  Seungjin Choi,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2009, Handbook of Natural Computing.

[36]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[37]  W. Klimesch Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[39]  Hakwan Lau,et al.  A decisional account of subjective inflation of visual perception at the periphery , 2014, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[40]  D. Schwarzkopf,et al.  Relating inter-individual differences in metacognitive performance on different perceptual tasks , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[41]  R. Kawashima,et al.  Right frontopolar cortex activity correlates with reliability of retrospective rating of confidence in short-term recognition memory performance , 2010, Neuroscience Research.

[42]  Floris P. de Lange,et al.  Anatomical Coupling between Distinct Metacognitive Systems for Memory and Visual Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  H. Lau,et al.  A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[44]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[45]  Richard Ambrosini,et al.  A Practical Guide to the Selection of Automated Chemical Analyzers , 1980 .

[46]  H. Lau,et al.  How to measure metacognition , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[47]  J. Lange,et al.  Prestimulus Alpha Power Influences Tactile Temporal Perceptual Discrimination and Confidence in Decisions. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[49]  Susan J. Galvin,et al.  Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability: Discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  B. Postle,et al.  Prestimulus alpha-band power biases visual discrimination confidence, but not accuracy , 2016, Consciousness and Cognition.

[51]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Confidence Leak in Perceptual Decision Making , 2015, Psychological science.

[52]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Metacognition of attention during tactile discrimination , 2017, NeuroImage.

[53]  F. Díaz,et al.  Movement related cortical potentials in a face naming task: influence of the tip-of-the-tongue state. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[54]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  M. Sigman,et al.  Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments , 2016, Cognition.

[56]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes , 1998 .

[57]  Tony Ro,et al.  Action-Specific Disruption of Perceptual Confidence , 2015, Psychological science.

[58]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Measures of metacognition on signal-detection theoretic models. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[59]  S. Fleming,et al.  Domain-specific impairment in metacognitive accuracy following anterior prefrontal lesions , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[60]  P. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) , 2014 .