Gaze in a real-world social interaction: A dual eye-tracking study

People communicate using verbal and non-verbal cues, including gaze cues. Gaze allocation can be influenced by social factors; however, most research on gaze cueing has not considered these factors. The presence of social roles was manipulated in a natural, everyday collaborative task while eye movements were measured. In pairs, participants worked together to make a cake. Half of the pairs were given roles (“Chef” or “Gatherer”) and the other half were not. Across all participants we found, contrary to the results of static-image experiments, that participants spent very little time looking at each other, challenging the generalisability of the conclusions from lab-based paradigms. However, participants were more likely than not to look at their partner when receiving an instruction, highlighting the typical coordination of gaze cues and verbal communication in natural interactions. The mean duration of instances in which the partners looked at each other (partner gaze) was longer in the roles condition, and these participants were quicker to align their gaze with their partners (shared gaze). In addition, we found some indication that when hearing spoken instructions, listeners in the roles condition looked at the speaker more than listeners in the no roles condition. We conclude that social context can affect our gaze behaviour during a social interaction.

[1]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  The Art of Conversation Is Coordination , 2007, Psychological science.

[2]  Pia Knoeferle,et al.  Can Speaker Gaze Modulate Syntactic Structuring and Thematic Role Assignment during Spoken Sentence Comprehension? , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[3]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Speaking and Listening with the Eyes: Gaze Signaling during Dyadic Interactions , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Nicola C. Anderson,et al.  Exploiting human sensitivity to gaze for tracking the eyes , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[5]  Matthew J. Stainer,et al.  Coordinating Vision and Action in Natural Behaviour: Differences in Spatiotemporal Coupling in Everyday Tasks , 2017, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[6]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Looking while eating: The importance of social context to social attention , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[7]  J. S. Efran Looking for approval: effects on visual behavior of approbation from persons differing in importance. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Follow My Eyes: The Gaze of Politicians Reflexively Captures the Gaze of Ingroup Voters , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[10]  O. Watson,et al.  Quantitative Research in Proxemic Behavior1 , 1966 .

[11]  A. Kendon Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[12]  Evan F. Risko,et al.  Eyes wide shut: implied social presence, eye tracking and attention , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[13]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Get real! Resolving the debate about equivalent social stimuli , 2009 .

[14]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking , 2010, Cognition.

[15]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Breaking the Fourth Wall of Cognitive Science , 2016 .

[16]  Benjamin W Tatler,et al.  Do as eye say: gaze cueing and language in a real-world social interaction. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[17]  Benjamin W. Tatler,et al.  Referent expressions and gaze: reference type influences real-world gaze cue utilization. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw,et al.  Potential social interactions are important to social attention , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  S. Brennan Eye gaze cues for coordination in collaborative tasks , 2011 .

[20]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Cognitive Ethology: a new approach for studying human cognition. , 2008, British journal of psychology.

[21]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  My eyes want to look where your eyes are looking: Exploring the tendency to imitate another individual's gaze , 2002, Neuroreport.

[22]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[23]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: the cooperative eye hypothesis. , 2007, Journal of human evolution.

[24]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[25]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[26]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Visual Behavior and Dominance in Women and Men , 1981 .

[27]  Märta Kalmaru,et al.  Breaking the fourth wall , 2016 .

[28]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .

[29]  A. Modigliani,et al.  Embarrassment, facework, and eye contact: testing a theory of embarrassment. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Where Do We Look During Potentially Offensive Behavior? , 2008, Psychological science.

[31]  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw,et al.  Camouflaged attention: covert attention is critical to social communication in natural settings , 2016 .

[32]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  Jan Zwickel,et al.  How the presence of persons biases eye movements , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Why do we look at people's eyes? , 2007 .

[35]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[36]  A. L. Yarbus Eye Movements During Perception of Complex Objects , 1967 .

[37]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  The directional flow of visual information transfer between pedestrians , 2012, Biology Letters.

[38]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Squeezing Uncertainty from Saccadic Compression , 2007 .