Reducing the cost of Ca-based direct air capture of CO2.

Direct air capture, the chemical removal of CO2 directly from the atmosphere, may play a role in mitigating future climate risk or form the basis of a sustainable transportation infrastructure. The current discussion is centered on the estimated cost of the technology and its link to "overshoot" trajectories, where atmospheric CO2 levels are actively reduced later in the century. The American Physical Society (APS) published a report, later updated, estimating the cost of a one million tonne CO2 per year air capture facility constructed today that highlights several fundamental concepts of chemical air capture. These fundamentals are viewed through the lens of a chemical process that cycles between removing CO2 from the air and releasing the absorbed CO2 in concentrated form. This work builds on the APS report to investigate the effect of modifications to the air capture system based on suggestions in the report and subsequent publications. The work shows that reduced carbon electricity and plastic packing materials (for the contactor) may have significant effects on the overall price, reducing the APS estimate from $610 to $309/tCO2 avoided. Such a reduction does not challenge postcombustion capture from point sources, estimated at $80/tCO2, but does make air capture a feasible alternative for the transportation sector and a potential negative emissions technology. Furthermore, air capture represents atmospheric reductions rather than simply avoided emissions.

[1]  Karin Ackermann,et al.  Mechanics Of Hydraulic Fracturing , 2016 .

[2]  Frank Zeman,et al.  Energy and material balance of CO2 capture from ambient air. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  David William Keith,et al.  An air–liquid contactor for large-scale capture of CO2 from air , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Christopher W. Jones,et al.  Application of amine-tethered solid sorbents for direct CO2 capture from the ambient air. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Syed M. Zubair,et al.  A complete model of wet cooling towers with fouling in fills , 2006 .

[6]  P. Vergragt,et al.  Carbon capture and storage, bio-energy with carbon capture and storage, and the escape from the fossil-fuel lock-in , 2011 .

[7]  K. Lackner,et al.  No . 2 CAPTURING CARBON DIOXIDE DIRECTLY FROM THE ATMOSPHERE , 2006 .

[8]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  An idealized assessment of the economics of air capture of carbon dioxide in mitigation policy , 2009 .

[9]  M. Tavoni,et al.  Direct air capture of CO2 and climate stabilization: A model based assessment , 2013, Climatic Change.

[10]  M. Constantinescu,et al.  Coupled CO2 recovery from the atmosphere and water electrolysis: Feasibility of a new process for hydrogen storage , 1995 .

[11]  Renato Baciocchi,et al.  Process design and energy requirements for the capture of carbon dioxide from air , 2006 .

[12]  Manya Ranjan,et al.  Economic and energetic analysis of capturing CO2 from ambient air , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Randall Lewis,et al.  Retrofitted plug-in hybrid vehicles: Results of NYIT drive share program , 2012 .

[14]  G. Rau,et al.  Electrochemical splitting of calcium carbonate to increase solution alkalinity: implications for mitigation of carbon dioxide and ocean acidity. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Klaus S. Lackner,et al.  Carbon dioxide extraction from air: Is it an option? , 1999 .

[16]  Sarah Brennan,et al.  The urgency of the development of CO2 capture from ambient air , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of co-fired biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems with inclusion of economies of scale , 2003 .

[18]  David W Keith,et al.  Carbon neutral hydrocarbons , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  David W. Keith,et al.  Why Capture CO2 from the Atmosphere? , 2009, Science.

[20]  O. Ricci Providing adequate economic incentives for bioenergies with CO2 capture and geological storage , 2012 .

[21]  Denis Cormier,et al.  Life cycle emissions and cost of producing electricity from coal, natural gas, and wood pellets in Ontario, Canada. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Frank Zeman,et al.  Experimental results for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere , 2008 .

[23]  David W. Keith,et al.  Low-energy sodium hydroxide recovery for CO2 capture from atmospheric air—Thermodynamic analysis , 2009 .

[24]  K. Lindgren,et al.  The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) , 2010 .

[25]  Ingrid Nohlgren,et al.  Non-conventional causticization technology: A review , 2004 .

[26]  R. Williams,et al.  Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part B: Economic analysis , 2005 .

[27]  Meyer Steinberg,et al.  Production of synthetic methanol from air and water using controlled thermonuclear reactor power—I. technology and energy requirement , 1977 .

[28]  M. Torn,et al.  Ecological limits to terrestrial biological carbon dioxide removal , 2013, Climatic Change.

[29]  W. Broecker Does air capture constitute a viable backstop against a bad CO2 trip , 2013 .

[30]  Renato Baciocchi,et al.  Direct air capture of CO2 with chemicals: optimization of a two-loop hydroxide carbonate system using a countercurrent air-liquid contactor , 2013, Climatic Change.

[31]  David W. Keith,et al.  Why Capture CO2 from the Atmosphere? , 2009, Science.