Collaborative governance in international disasters: Nargis cyclone in Myanmar and Sichuan earthquake in China cases

Systemic problems have long prevailed and plagued the international disaster relief scene. Despite the reformatory efforts of the United Nations (UN), the international disaster management system does not have a well-integrated approach to ensure successful coordination of disaster management operations among its relief and partner organisations. This paper analyses the current structure of international disaster management and the UN reform initiatives to improve the coordination structure and identifies the main actors in the international disaster management system. Comparing the May 2008 cases of the Nargis cyclone in Myanmar and the China earthquake in Sichuan province, this paper analyses the issues related to coordination and collaboration between the international relief organisations. The Myanmar cyclone and the Sichuan Earthquake cases are characterised by very different response patterns. The analytical model helps in understanding the striking differences in response from the international system to the two events.

[1]  Barry Turner,et al.  North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) , 2003 .

[2]  M. Lipson.  Interorganizational Coordination in Complex Peacekeeping , 2005 .

[3]  Kayode Oyegbite.  What have we learned? Coordination. , 2005, Prehospital and disaster medicine.

[4]  Abraham L. Newman,et al.  Escaping the International Governance Dilemma? Incorporated Transgovernmental Networks in the European Union , 2008 .

[5]  N. Kapucu.  Interagency Communication Networks During Emergencies , 2006 .

[6]  Esther K. Hicks,et al.  Coordinating disaster relief after the South Asia earthquake , 2006 .

[7]  Bruce R. Pirnie,et al.  Strengthening the Partnership: Improving Military Coordination with Relief Agencies and Allies in Humanitarian Operations , 2000 .

[8]  Carsten Völz,et al.  Humanitarian coordination in Indonesia: an NGO viewpoint , 2005 .

[9]  Barry Turner,et al.  United Nations (UN) , 2009 .

[10]  A. Benini,et al.  Network Without Centre? A Case Study of an Organizational Network Responding to an Earthquake , 1999 .

[11]  R. Kent,et al.  International humanitarian crises: two decades before and two decades beyond , 2004 .

[12]  Donald P. Moynihan,et al.  Combining Structural Forms in the Search for Policy Tools: Incident Command Systems in U.S. Crisis Management , 2008 .

[13]  Max Stephenson,et al.  Interorganizational trust, boundary spanning, and humanitarian relief coordination , 2006 .

[14]  Max Stephenson,et al.  Toward a Descriptive Model of Humanitarian Assistance Coordination , 2006 .

[15]  S. Moore,et al.  International NGOs and the role of network centrality in humanitarian aid operations: a case study of coordination during the 2000 Mozambique floods. , 2003, Disasters.

[16]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Communication, Coherence, and Collective Action , 2006 .

[17]  Randolph C Kent,et al.  The Anatomy of Disaster Relief: The International Network in Action , 1987 .

[18]  R. Sylves.  Disaster Policy and Politics: Emergency Management and Homeland Security , 2008 .

[19]  Melinda Moore,et al.  Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Learning from Exemplary Practices in International Disaster Management : A Fresh Avenue to Inform U . S . Policy ? , 2011 .

[20]  W. Scott,et al.  Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives , 2006 .

[21]  Horacio R. Trujillo,et al.  Models of Relief , 2007 .

[22]  John Borton,et al.  Recent trends in the international relief system. , 1993, Disasters.

[23]  Max Stephenson,et al.  Making humanitarian relief networks more effective: operational coordination, trust and sense making. , 2005, Disasters.

[24]  Andrew S Natsios,et al.  NGOs and the UN system in complex humanitarian emergencies: Conflict or cooperation? , 1995 .