Scanner arc illumination and impact on EUV photomasks and scanner imaging

The combination of a reflective photomask with the non-telecentric illumination and arc shaped slit of the EUV scanner introduces what are known as shadowing effects. The compensation of these effects requires proper biasing of the photomask to generate the intended image on the wafer. Thus, the physical pattern on the mask ends up being noticeably different from the desired pattern to be written on the wafer. This difference has a strong dependence on both the illumination settings and the features to be printed. In this work, the impact of shadowing effects from line and space patterns with a nominal CD of 16nm at wafer was investigated with particular focus on the influence of pattern orientation and pitch, illumination pupil shape and fill (coherence) and absorber height. CD, best focus shift and contrast at best focus are utilized in detail in order to study the impact of the shadowing effects. All the simulation cases presented employ a complete scanner arc emulation, i.e. describe the impact of the azimuthal angle component of the illumination arc as in the NXE:3300 scanner and as it can be emulated by the AIMSTM EUV.

[1]  Pei-yang Yan Impact of EUVL mask buffer and absorber material properties on mask quality and performance , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Tristan Bret,et al.  Ebeam based mask repair as door opener for defect free EUV masks , 2012, Photomask Technology.

[3]  Guido Schiffelers,et al.  Achievements and challenges of EUV mask imaging , 2014, Photomask and Next Generation Lithography Mask Technology.

[4]  Carl Zeiss SMS GmbH-Carl-Zeiss-Promenade,et al.  E-beam induced EUV photomask repair – a perfect match , 2010 .

[5]  Guido Schiffelers,et al.  ASML's NXE platform performance and volume introduction , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Thomas Scheruebl,et al.  Defect mitigation considerations for EUV photomasks , 2014 .

[7]  T. Bret,et al.  Closing the gap for EUV mask repair , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Natalia Davydova,et al.  EUV mask stack optimization for enhanced imaging performance , 2010, Photomask Technology.

[9]  R. Scholz,et al.  Mo/Si Multilayers with Different Barrier Layers for Applications as Extreme Ultraviolet Mirrors , 2002 .

[10]  Petra Spies,et al.  A novel electron-beam-based photomask repair tool , 2003, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[11]  Eelco van Setten,et al.  Impact of mask absorber on EUV imaging performance , 2010, European Mask and Lithography Conference.

[12]  Winfried Kaiser,et al.  Mask effects for high-NA EUV: impact of NA, chief-ray-angle, and reduction ratio , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Troy W. Barbee,et al.  Advances in multilayer reflective coatings for extreme ultraviolet lithography , 1999, Advanced Lithography.