Using Citizen Heritage Science to Monitor Remote Sites Before and During the First COVID-19 Lockdown: A Comparison of Two Methods

This paper proposes citizen heritage science as an effective method to gather reliable data for monitoring and documenting heritage sites. For large heritage organisations the monitoring and documentation of sites in their care presents considerable challenges;continual monitoring of smaller, unstaffed, and more remote sites is often not practical. However, heritage sites are often popular destinations that receive high levels of visitors who carry increasingly sophisticated mobile phones. It seems logical that heritage organisations capitalise on using visitors’ images to record and monitor remote heritage sites. We compare two methods for data collection: a ‘guided’ approach, in which on-site signage prompts visitor submissions;and an ‘open’ approach, in which the public is asked to send any photographs they have of the site in question. We analyse the different results in collected data from these two approaches and hope to encourage heritage institutions to set up similar projects. [ FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Pierre Hallot,et al.  Digital Twin: Research Framework to Support Preventive Conservation Policies , 2020, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[2]  P. Ryan,et al.  COVID-19 and citizen science: lessons learned from southern Africa , 2020 .

[3]  Brendon Wilkins,et al.  Designing a Collaborative Peer-to-peer System for Archaeology: The DigVentures Platform , 2020 .

[4]  R. Samson,et al.  Citizen Science and Sustainability Transitions , 2020, Academy of Management Proceedings.

[5]  Pakhee Kumar Crowdsourcing to rescue cultural heritage during disasters: A case study of the 1966 Florence Flood , 2020 .

[6]  D. González-Aguilera,et al.  A Digital-based Integrated Methodology for the Preventive Conservation of Cultural Heritage: The Experience of HeritageCare Project , 2019, International Journal of Architectural Heritage.

[7]  Kilian Vos,et al.  Shoreline change mapping using crowd-sourced smartphone images , 2019, Coastal Engineering.

[8]  Florian Heigl,et al.  Opinion: Toward an international definition of citizen science , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  May Cassar,et al.  Crowdsourcing as an Analytical Method: Metrology of Smartphone Measurements in Heritage Science , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[10]  A. Bevan,et al.  Participation in heritage crowdsourcing , 2018, Museum Management and Curatorship.

[11]  T. Wess,et al.  Smartphone citizen science: can a conservation hypothesis be tested using non specialist technology? , 2017, Heritage Science.

[12]  Zhenghong Tang,et al.  Evaluating the aesthetic value of cultural ecosystem services by mapping geo-tagged photographs from social media data on Panoramio and Flickr , 2017 .

[13]  Siân Jones Wrestling with the Social Value of Heritage: Problems, Dilemmas and Opportunities , 2017 .

[14]  N. Tse,et al.  The potential role of citizen conservation in re-shaping approaches to murals in an urban context , 2016 .

[15]  Katherine A Johnson,et al.  Real Life Science with Dandelions and Project BudBurst , 2016, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[16]  Marshall J. Iliff,et al.  Can Observation Skills of Citizen Scientists Be Estimated Using Species Accumulation Curves? , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  Dieter Fritsch,et al.  Crowd-sourcing the 3D digital reconstructions of lost cultural heritage , 2015, 2015 Digital Heritage.

[18]  J. Gregory Connecting with the past through social media: the ‘Beautiful buildings and cool places Perth has lost’ Facebook group , 2015 .

[19]  Chiara Bonacchi,et al.  Crowd-sourced Archaeological Research: The MicroPasts Project , 2014 .

[20]  A. Lin The search for Genghis Khan: Using modern tools to hunt for an ancient past , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[21]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .