The efficacy of different preprocessing steps in reducing motion-related confounds in diffusion MRI connectomics

Head motion is a major confounding factor in neuroimaging studies. While numerous studies have investigated how motion impacts estimates of functional connectivity, the effects of motion on structural connectivity measured using diffusion MRI have not received the same level of attention, despite the fact that, like functional MRI, diffusion MRI relies on elaborate preprocessing pipelines that require multiple choices at each step. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of how these choices influence motion-related contamination of structural connectivity estimates. Using a healthy adult sample (N = 252), we evaluated 240 different preprocessing pipelines, devised using plausible combinations of different choices related to explicit head motion correction, tractography propagation algorithms, track seeding methods, track termination constraints, quantitative metrics derived for each connectome edge, and parcellations. We found that an approach to motion correction that includes outlier replacement and within-slice volume correction led to a dramatic reduction in cross-subject correlations between head motion and structural connectivity strength, and that motion contamination is more severe when quantifying connectivity strength using mean tract fractional anisotropy rather than streamline count. We also show that the choice of preprocessing strategy can significantly influence subsequent inferences about network organization, with the location of network hubs varying considerably depending on the specific preprocessing steps applied. Our findings indicate that the impact of motion on structural connectivity can be successfully mitigated using recent motion-correction algorithms that include outlier replacement and within-slice motion correction. Highlights We assess how motion affects structural connectivity in 240 preprocessing pipelines Motion contamination of structural connectivity depends on preprocessing choices Advanced motion correction tools reduce motion confounds FA edge weighting is more susceptible to motion effects than streamline count

[1]  Alan Connelly,et al.  SIFT: Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms , 2013, NeuroImage.

[2]  A. Fornito,et al.  The development of brain network hubs , 2018, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Weighted linear least squares estimation of diffusion MRI parameters: Strengths, limitations, and pitfalls , 2013, NeuroImage.

[4]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Consistency-based thresholding of the human connectome , 2017, NeuroImage.

[5]  Stefan Skare,et al.  How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[6]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[7]  Martijn P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Estimating false positives and negatives in brain networks , 2013, NeuroImage.

[8]  Martin Styner,et al.  DTIPrep: quality control of diffusion-weighted images , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[9]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Fiber tracking: principles and strategies – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[10]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Connectivity-based functional analysis of dopamine release in the striatum using diffusion-weighted MRI and positron emission tomography. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  FreeSurfer , 2012, NeuroImage.

[12]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[13]  A. Mayer,et al.  Head injury or head motion? Assessment and quantification of motion artifacts in diffusion tensor imaging studies , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Ben D. Fulcher,et al.  Developmental Changes in Brain Network Hub Connectivity in Late Adolescence , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Edward T Bullmore,et al.  A Network Neuroscience Approach to Typical and Atypical Brain Development. , 2018, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[16]  J C Gore,et al.  Analysis and correction of motion artifacts in diffusion weighted imaging , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: Relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth , 2012, NeuroImage.

[18]  P. Basser,et al.  Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion‐weighted MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[20]  Ben D. Fulcher,et al.  Consistency and differences between centrality measures across distinct classes of networks , 2018, PloS one.

[21]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Measuring brain connectivity: Diffusion tensor imaging validates resting state temporal correlations , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  Alexander Leemans,et al.  Diffusion MRI-based cortical connectome reconstruction: dependency on tractography procedures and neuroanatomical characteristics , 2018, Brain Structure and Function.

[24]  Alan Connelly,et al.  The effects of SIFT on the reproducibility and biological accuracy of the structural connectome , 2015, NeuroImage.

[25]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[26]  Derek K. Jones Challenges and limitations of quantifying brain connectivity in vivo with diffusion MRI , 2010 .

[27]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[28]  Yong He,et al.  Graph theoretical modeling of baby brain networks , 2019, NeuroImage.

[29]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Understanding the Emergence of Neuropsychiatric Disorders With Network Neuroscience. , 2018, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[30]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution , 2007, NeuroImage.

[31]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  C. Stam Modern network science of neurological disorders , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  Alan Connelly,et al.  MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions , 2012, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[34]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  O. Sporns,et al.  The economy of brain network organization , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Alan Connelly,et al.  MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation , 2019, NeuroImage.

[38]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Fundamentals of Brain Network Analysis , 2016 .

[39]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[40]  Tong Zhu,et al.  Comparison of quality control software tools for diffusion tensor imaging. , 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[41]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data , 2013, NeuroImage.

[42]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[43]  Chun-Hung Yeh,et al.  Connectomes from streamlines tractography: Assigning streamlines to brain parcellations is not trivial but highly consequential , 2019, NeuroImage.

[44]  Swathi P. Iyer,et al.  Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[45]  Chun-Hung Yeh,et al.  MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation , 2019, NeuroImage.

[46]  Walter H Backes,et al.  Assessing and minimizing the effects of noise and motion in clinical DTI at 3 T , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[47]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Connectome sensitivity or specificity: which is more important? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[48]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Can structure predict function in the human brain? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[49]  Ben D. Fulcher,et al.  An evaluation of the efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of motion correction strategies for resting-state functional MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[50]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[51]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[52]  Ragini Verma,et al.  The impact of in-scanner head motion on structural connectivity derived from diffusion MRI , 2018, NeuroImage.

[53]  Peter F. Neher,et al.  The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography , 2017, Nature Communications.

[54]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[55]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Whole-brain anatomical networks: Does the choice of nodes matter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[56]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Towards a comprehensive framework for movement and distortion correction of diffusion MR images: Within volume movement , 2017, NeuroImage.

[57]  Govinda R. Poudel,et al.  The multi-modal Australian ScienceS Imaging and Visualization Environment (MASSIVE) high performance computing infrastructure: applications in neuroscience and neuroinformatics research , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[58]  Bennett A Landman,et al.  Challenges in diffusion MRI tractography - Lessons learned from international benchmark competitions. , 2019, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[59]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[60]  Ragini Verma,et al.  The impact of quality assurance assessment on diffusion tensor imaging outcomes in a large-scale population-based cohort , 2016, NeuroImage.

[61]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  COMMIT: Convex Optimization Modeling for Microstructure Informed Tractography , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[62]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  The effects of connection reconstruction method on the interregional connectivity of brain networks via diffusion tractography , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[63]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies , 2019 .

[64]  Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos,et al.  An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging , 2016, NeuroImage.

[65]  O. Sporns,et al.  Network hubs in the human brain , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  D. Leopold,et al.  Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion MRI tractography is inherently limited , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Ben Jeurissen,et al.  Diffusion MRI fiber tractography of the brain , 2019, NMR in biomedicine.

[68]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Three‐dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[69]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[70]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[71]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Genetic Influences on Cost-Efficient Organization of Human Cortical Functional Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  David K. Yu,et al.  Superficial white matter fiber systems impede detection of long-range cortical connections in diffusion MR tractography , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Human cortical connectome reconstruction from diffusion weighted MRI: The effect of tractography algorithm , 2012, NeuroImage.

[74]  Alan Connelly,et al.  SIFT2: Enabling dense quantitative assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography , 2015, NeuroImage.

[75]  Sean P. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Automated quality control for within and between studies diffusion MRI data using a non-parametric framework for movement and distortion correction , 2019, NeuroImage.

[76]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[77]  Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos,et al.  Incorporating outlier detection and replacement into a non-parametric framework for movement and distortion correction of diffusion MR images , 2016, NeuroImage.

[78]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  C. Beaulieu,et al.  The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[80]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[81]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Anatomically-constrained tractography: Improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information , 2012, NeuroImage.

[82]  Graham L. Baum,et al.  Modular Segregation of Structural Brain Networks Supports the Development of Executive Function in Youth , 2016, Current Biology.

[83]  A. Connelly,et al.  Improved probabilistic streamlines tractography by 2 nd order integration over fibre orientation distributions , 2009 .

[84]  Yong He,et al.  Developmental Connectomics from Infancy through Early Childhood , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[85]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[86]  M. Breakspear,et al.  The connectomics of brain disorders , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[87]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[88]  Peter F. Neher,et al.  Limits to anatomical accuracy of diffusion tractography using modern approaches , 2018 .

[89]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  “Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins”: How noise distorts diffusion‐weighted MR data , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[90]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[91]  Stefan Skare,et al.  A Model-Based Method for Retrospective Correction of Geometric Distortions in Diffusion-Weighted EPI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[92]  M. Bellgrove,et al.  Functional Connectivity of Corticostriatal Circuitry and Psychosis-like Experiences in the General Community , 2018, Biological Psychiatry.

[93]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE Original Research Article , 2009 .

[94]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Towards quantitative connectivity analysis: reducing tractography biases , 2014, NeuroImage.