How teachers engage with Assessment for Learning: lessons from the classroom

Using video recordings of lessons and interviews with teachers, this article explores the way in which teachers enact Assessment for Learning (AfL) practices in their classrooms. Starting with the hypothesis that AfL is built on an underlying pedagogic principle that foregrounds the promotion of pupil autonomy, we analyse the ways in which teachers instantiate this principle in practice. A distinction is drawn between lessons that embody the ‘spirit’ of AfL and those that conform only to the ‘letter’. The nature and sequence of tasks and especially ‘high organization based on ideas’ appears crucial to the former. This adds a dimension to more familiar formulations of AFL practices. We also ask whether the teachers’ beliefs about learning contribute to the different ways in which they interpret the procedures of AfL. Interviews with teachers indicated that those whose lessons captured the spirit of AfL were more likely to take responsibility for success and failure in the promotion of pupil autonomy. Thus they had a sense of their own agency and sought to use it to overcome barriers to learning.

[1]  Clare Lee,et al.  Assessment for Learning- putting it into practice , 2003 .

[2]  Gary D. Phye,et al.  Handbook of Academic Learning: Construction of Knowledge , 1997 .

[3]  P. Black,et al.  Learning How to Learn, in Classrooms, Schools and Networks: aims, design and analysis , 2006 .

[4]  David Pedder Organizational conditions that foster successful classroom promotion of Learning How to Learn , 2006 .

[5]  A. Sfard On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[6]  B. Marshall Goals or horizons—the conundrum of progression in English: or a possible way of understanding formative assessment in English , 2004 .

[7]  Classroom assessment up close – and personal , 2005 .

[8]  Mary James,et al.  Improving Learning How to Learn: Classrooms, Schools and Networks , 2007 .

[9]  E. Bredo,et al.  The Social Construction of Learning , 1997 .

[10]  Mary James,et al.  Beyond method: assessment and learning practices and values , 2006 .

[11]  Mary Jane Drummond,et al.  Assessing children's learning , 1993 .

[12]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[13]  C A Nelson,et al.  Learning to Learn , 2017, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[14]  M. Hammersley Researching school experience: Ethnographic studies of teaching and learning , 1999 .

[15]  M. James Assessment, Teaching and Theories of Learning , 2006 .

[16]  Charles R Meyer,et al.  Inside the black box. , 2008, Minnesota medicine.

[17]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[18]  M. Fullan The New Meaning of Educational Change , 1990 .

[19]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[20]  J. Dewey Experience and Education , 1938 .

[21]  Paul Black,et al.  Learning How to Learn and Assessment for Learning: a theoretical inquiry , 2006 .

[22]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Teaching as the Learning Profession : Handbook of Policy and Practice , 1999 .

[23]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[24]  D. Sadler Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[25]  Michael Glassman,et al.  Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice , 2001 .

[26]  Susan Hart,et al.  Learning without Limits , 2004 .

[27]  D. Wood Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development. By Carol S. Dweck. Psychology Press, Hove, 1999. pp. 195. £29.95 (hb). , 2000 .

[28]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .