not choose to produce, or will not produce in a socially efficient manner. The form of taxation adopted by a government may be influenced by a number of factors, but equity considerations are often important. Thus, tax systems frequently aim to alter the distribution of post-tax incomes (or some other measure of individuals' command over goods and services) from that of pre-tax incomes. Of course, redistribution brought about by taxation can alter individuals' command only over marketed goods and services. However, the effects of the fiscal system as a whole (tax and government expenditure) on redistribution may be very different from redistribution via taxation alone. Unfortunately, although there have been many attempts to measure the distributional impact of specific taxes or tax systems, the theoretical and empirical difficulties experienced when trying to measure the redistributional effect of publicly provided goods and services places severe limitations on attempts to measure fiscal redistribution. Recent British and US studies of fiscal incidence have tended to allocate the benefits of government expenditure across income groups in line with their estimated consumption of government services. Government services that cannot be allocated specifically have usually been allocated using various
[1]
J. Grand.
On measuring the distributional impact of public expenditure
,
1986
.
[2]
J. Creedy,et al.
Income Redistribution through Taxes and Transfers in Britain
,
1984
.
[3]
L. Osberg,et al.
The Redistribution of Income in Canada
,
1983
.
[4]
J. Grand.
The Distribution of Public Expenditure on Education
,
1982
.
[5]
J. Creedy,et al.
The Built-In Flexibility of Progressive Income Taxes: A Simple Model
,
1982
.
[6]
M. O'higgins,et al.
THE DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AMONG HOUSEHOLDS IN THE UNITED STATES
,
1981
.
[7]
J. L. Grand,et al.
The Distribution of Public Expenditure: The Case of Health Care
,
1978
.
[8]
R. Musgrave,et al.
Public Finance in Theory and Practice
,
1961
.