Resolving superimposed motor unit action potentials

A new algorithm to resolve superimposed motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) is described, which uses a reduced search space and is based on the peel off approach. Knowledge specific to the problem domain, such as temporal relationships between and within motor unit action potential trains and MUAP energy information, is used to reduce the search space of motor units, possibly contributing to a superposition. The algorithm is tested using real electromyographic signals, and it demonstrates robust performance across the signals tested. For the signals tested, the average total resolution rate is 94%, the average correct resolution rate is 99.2% and the average error rate is 0.85%.

[1]  D. Luenberger.  Optimization by Vector Space Methods , 1968 .

[2]  R Shiavi,et al.  The effect of measurement errors on correlation estimates in spike-interval sequences. , 1973, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[3]  V J Prochazka,et al.  On-line multi-unit sorting with resolution of superposition potentials. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  S Andreassen,et al.  Regulation of the firing pattern of single motor units. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Ronald S. Lefever,et al.  A Procedure for Decomposing the Myoelectric Signal Into Its Constituent Action Potentials - Part I: Technique, Theory, and Implementation , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Rui J. P. de Figueiredo,et al.  Separation of superimposed signals by a cross-correlation method , 1982, ICASSP.

[8]  R. D. Figueiredo,et al.  Separation of superimposed signals by a cross-correlation method , 1983 .

[9]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  High-Resolution Alignment of Sampled Waveforms , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  F. van der Ploeg,et al.  Applied decision analysis and economic behaviour , 1984 .

[11]  Randall Trudell.  The Physiological and Technical Basis of Electromyography , 1985 .

[12]  William F. Brown,et al.  The Physiological and Technical Basis of Electromyography , 1985 .

[13]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Automatic Decomposition of the Clinical Electromyogram , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  H. Broman.  Knowledge-based signal processing in the decomposition of myoelectric signals , 1988, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[15]  L J Dorfman,et al.  Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysis , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[16]  C J De Luca,et al.  Synchronization of motor-unit firings in several human muscles. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  E Stålberg,et al.  Reference values of motor unit action potentials obtained with multi‐MUAP analysis , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  E Stålberg,et al.  Outliers, a way to detect abnormality in quantitative EMG , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[19]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Motor unit number estimates based on the automated analysis of F‐responses , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[20]  M Sonoo,et al.  Assessment of variability in the shape of the motor unit action potential, the “jiggle,” at consecutive discharges , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[21]  G. H. Loudon,et al.  New signal processing techniques for the decomposition of EMG signals , 1992, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[22]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Robust method for estimating motor unit firing-pattern statistics , 2007, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  D. Stashuk,et al.  Adaptive motor unit action potential clustering using shape and temporal information , 2007, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.