Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops

Abstract Cultivation priority planning is a very important and vital step in suitable and sustainable revenue of agricultural land. The growth of urban areas and industrial intensification has contributed to a reduction in valuable agricultural lands and to various environmental impacts including climate change. This reduction in agricultural land severely impacts food production and food security. In order to effectively address this issue, spatial analytical and optimization methods based on evaluating multiple criteria decision are needed to evaluate the capability and suitability of available lands for current and future food production. The objective of this study is to implement the GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques as an improved method of multi-criteria decision making for evaluating areas suitable for cultivation priority planning of maize, rape and soybean crops. For this purpose, 12,000 ha land which is located in Ardabil province, west-north of Iran was investigated by excavation of 167 soil profiles and 313 augers. After soil sampling and analysis, soils were classified in Aridisols. 24 soil series and 66 land units were identified and separated in study area. The several criteria had limitation for maize, rape and soybean cultivation in studying lands which the most limiting evaluation criteria including soil depth, slope, climate, pH, electrical conductivity, exchangeable sodium percentage, calcium carbonate and gypsum were selected for usage in prioritization models by principal component analysis and multi-dimensional scaling methods. Selected criteria were very important in growth of maize, rape and soybean. Simple additive weighting (SAW), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods were used for cultivation priority planning of maize, rape and soybean crops in land units. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy AHP approaches were used to determine weight values of the criteria. Multivariate variance analysis proves significant difference among three methods at 0.05 probability level. With attention to allocated scores by prioritization models, crops cultivation priority was determined as maize, rape and soybean in land units, respectively and maize crop was preferred to other plants. The statistical analysis results with regard to mean comparison derived from least significant difference (LSD) test showed that Fuzzy TOPSIS method set cultivation priority planning of maize, rape and soybean crops for land units more accurately than the others, due to fuzzy TOPSIS method used appropriate values of criteria weights, twin comparing nature of alternative (crop) from positive and negative ideal, data standardization, mathematical equations and matrixes as well as fuzzy logic relations and principles for calculation of process performing. This study emphasizes the successful application of MCDA in dealing with complicated issues in the context of cultivation priority planning management. It is anticipated that, the integration of this developed framework in the planning policies of cultivation priority in developing countries as an effective tool for integrated regional land use planning can help in conducting better control over soil, land and environment losses.

[1]  Yu-Jie Wang,et al.  Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Gopal Achari,et al.  Uncertainty propagation in environmental decision making using random sets , 2010 .

[3]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[4]  Rodger Benson Tomlinson,et al.  Coastal Management Issues in Queensland and application of the Multi- Criteria Decision Making techniques , 2009 .

[5]  Thanh Tuan Nguyen,et al.  Design of a GIS and multi-criteria based land evaluation procedure for sustainable land-use planning at the regional level , 2015 .

[6]  Demetris Demetriou,et al.  The assessment of land valuation in land consolidation schemes: The need for a new land valuation framework , 2016 .

[7]  Stefan Hajkowicz,et al.  A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management , 2007 .

[8]  Dmitry Podkopaev,et al.  Simple additive weighting - A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Serkan Yavuz,et al.  Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  F. Tubiello,et al.  Global food security under climate change , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  Environmental assessment of maize production alternatives: Traditional, intensive and GMO-based cropping patterns , 2015 .

[12]  Yu-Jie Wang,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[13]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview , 2004 .

[14]  Anònim Anònim Keys to Soil Taxonomy , 2010 .

[15]  Mahdi Zarghami,et al.  A fuzzy-stochastic OWA model for robust multi-criteria decision making , 2008, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[16]  Joan E. Luther,et al.  An approach to GIS-based multiple criteria decision analysis that integrates exploration and evaluation phases: Case study in a forest-dominated landscape , 2010 .

[17]  Aïda Valls,et al.  ELECTRE-III-H: An outranking-based decision aiding method for hierarchically structured criteria , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior,et al.  A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[19]  Rodger Tomlinson,et al.  Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[20]  Mansour Ghorbani,et al.  The Economic Geology of Iran: Mineral Deposits and Natural Resources , 2013 .

[21]  Min Xie,et al.  A fuzzy TOPSIS and Rough Set based approach for mechanism analysis of product infant failure , 2016, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[22]  Mukhtar Elaalem,et al.  Land Suitability Evaluation for Sorghum Based on Boolean and Fuzzy-Multi-Criteria Decision AnalysisMethods , 2012 .

[23]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[24]  İrfan Ertuğrul,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection , 2008 .

[25]  Irfan Ertugrul,et al.  Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  David,et al.  An Assessment of LAnd , 2016 .

[27]  S. Hajkowicz Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Maryam Kordi,et al.  Effects of increasing fuzziness on analytic hierarchy process for spatial multicriteria decision analysis , 2012, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[29]  Samee Ullah Khan,et al.  Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  Chandra Prakash,et al.  Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment , 2015 .

[31]  M. S. García-Cascales,et al.  Comparative TOPSIS-ELECTRE TRI methods for optimal sites for photovoltaic solar farms. Case study in Spain , 2016 .

[32]  Yun Chen,et al.  Cellular automata-based spatial multi-criteria land suitability simulation for irrigated agriculture , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[33]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Map-based multicriteria analysis to support interactive land use allocation , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Da Sheng Wu,et al.  The Research of Evaluation for Growth Suitability of Carya Cathayensis Sarg. Based on PCA and AHP , 2011 .

[35]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) , 2006 .

[36]  Charles Scawthorn,et al.  Fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria decision making systems using particle swarm optimization , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[37]  E. Xevi,et al.  A multi-objective optimisation approach to water management. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  Mahdi Karbasian,et al.  The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis , 2010 .

[40]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Evaluating Water Quality Failure Potential in Water Distribution Systems: A Fuzzy-TOPSIS-OWA-based Methodology , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[41]  J. Silva,et al.  Assessment of land suitability and the possibility and performance of a canola (Brassica napus L.) – soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation in four basins of Golestan province, Iran , 2014 .

[42]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  Multi-attribute preference modelling and regional land-use planning , 2008 .

[43]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  Hamid Alinejad-Rokny,et al.  Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods for plant species selection (case study: reclamation plan of sungun Copper Mine; Iran). , 2011 .

[45]  E. Lambin,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity , 2011 .

[46]  Jianzhong Wang,et al.  Geometric Structure of High-Dimensional Data and Dimensionality Reduction , 2012 .

[47]  T. Cengiz,et al.  Application of analytical hierarchy process and geographic information systems in land-use suitability evaluation: a case study of Dümrek village (Çanakkale, Turkey) , 2009 .

[48]  Suzana Dragicevic,et al.  A GIS-based Logic Scoring of Preference method for evaluation of land capability and suitability for agriculture , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[49]  Sorin Nadaban,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS: A General View , 2016 .

[50]  Sangwook Lee,et al.  Determination of Priority Weights under Multiattribute Decision-Making Situations: AHP versus Fuzzy AHP , 2015 .

[51]  R. Tomlinson,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in the application of multi-criteria decision-making methods in Australian strategic environmental decisions , 2013 .

[52]  C. Hwang Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[53]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[54]  H. Akinci,et al.  Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique , 2013 .

[55]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Application of the TOPSIS and intuitionistic fuzzy set approaches for ranking the life cycle sustainability performance of alternative vehicle technologies , 2016 .

[56]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[57]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[58]  M. Elaalem A Comparison of Parametric and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Methods for Evaluating Land Suitability for Olive in Jeffara Plain of Libya , 2013 .

[59]  S. Hajkowicz,et al.  The assets, threats and solvability (ATS) model for setting environmental priorities , 2006 .

[60]  Osman Taylan,et al.  Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[61]  Daniela Fuchs-Hanusch,et al.  A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment: Integration of Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..