Determining Target Heart Rate for Exercising in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: A Retrospective Study

Background:One of the well-established methods used to determine endurance training intensity for patients in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is to take a percentage (70%–85%) of the maximal or peak heart rate (HRmax) from a recent postevent symptom-limited graded exercise test (GXT). Because many patients are referred to CR without having had a maximal GXT, a current practice is to use 30% to 50% above resting heart rate (RHR) to estimate endurance training intensity. Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine if a target heart rate (THR) of 30% to 50% above RHR approximated a THR of 70% to 85% of the HRmax achieved on GXT (HRmax GXT) and provided equivalent exercise intensity based on ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and metabolic equivalency thresholds (METs). Methods:A retrospective chart review of 53 patients enrolled in CR and had documentation of postevent GXT was conducted to determine the patient’s mean exercise heart rate (HR) achieved at each session to percentage above RHR and percentage HRmax GXT. Analysis was conducted to determine and compare patients’ HRs, RPE, and MET levels when patients were exercising within the THR ranges of 30% to 50% above RHR and 70% to 85% HRmax GXT. Results:A THR range of 30% to 50% above RHR approximated 60% to 70% HRmax GXT. Mean exercise HRs progressed from 39% to 49% above RHR sessions 2 to 6 with mean (SD) RPE of 10.58 (0.55) to 11.44 (0.68) on the Borg scale and mean (SD) MET level of 2.91 (0.55) to 3.31 (0.6). Mean exercise HRs progressed to 54% to 65% above RHR sessions 7 to 18 and approximated 70% to 73% HRmax GXT. Mean (SD) RPE at this intensity ranged from 11.57 (0.58) to 12.21 (0.53) with a mean (SD) MET level of 3.47 (0.6) to 3.8 (0.77). Conclusion:In the observed population, a THR of 30% to 50% above RHR underestimated the THR range of 70% to 85% HRmax GXT but provided adequate exercise intensity for patients at the beginning of a CR program based on percentage HRmax GXT, RPE and MET levels.

[1]  Lisa Hartling,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Secondary Prevention Programs for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  R J Robertson,et al.  The validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  E. Heath.  Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales , 1998 .

[4]  S. Normand,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  苅尾 七臣,et al.  ガイドライン解説 AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease : 2011 update , 2012 .

[6]  David R Bassett,et al.  2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  D. Hansen,et al.  Endurance Exercise Intensity Determination in the Rehabilitation of Coronary Artery Disease Patients , 2012, Sports Medicine.

[8]  M. Whaley,et al.  Exercise prescription using resting heart rate plus 20 or perceived exertion in cardiac rehabilitation. , 2004, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[9]  U. Wisløff,et al.  High‐Intensity Aerobic Exercise Training Improves the Heart in Health and Disease , 2010, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[10]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update: endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. , 2006, Circulation.

[11]  T. Mcconnell,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation without exercise tests for post-myocardial infarction and post-bypass surgery patients. , 1998, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[12]  Leonard A Kaminsky,et al.  Core competencies for cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention professionals: 2010 update: position statement of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. , 2011, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[13]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  John Spertus,et al.  AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients with Coronary and other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. , 2011, Circulation.

[15]  P. Thompson,et al.  ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription , 1995 .

[16]  F. Lalonde,et al.  Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Programs , 2012 .

[17]  Mark A Williams,et al.  Aerobic Exercise Intensity Assessment and Prescription in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A JOINT POSITION STATEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION AND REHABILITATION, THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND PULMONARY REHABILITATION, AND THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF CARDIAC , 2012, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[18]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.