Linguistic Inversion and Numerical Estimation

Number line estimation (NLE) performance is usually believed to depend on the magnitudes of presented numerals, rather than on the particular digits instantiating those magnitudes. Recent research, however, shows that NLE placements differ considerably for target numerals with nearly identical magnitudes, but instantiated with different leftmost digits. Here we investigate whether this left digit effect may be due, in part, to the ordering of digits in number words. In English, the leftmost digit of an Arabic numeral is spoken first (“forty-one”), but Dutch number words are characterized by the inversion property: the rightmost digit of a two-digit number word is spoken first (“eenenveertig” – one and forty in Dutch). Participants (N = 40 Dutch-English bilinguals and N = 20 English-speaking monolinguals) completed a standard 0-100 NLE task. Target numerals were read aloud by an experimenter in either English or Dutch. Preregistered analyses revealed a strong left digit effect in monolingual English speakers’ estimates: e.g., 41 was placed more than two units to the right of 39. No left digit effect was observed among Dutch-English bilingual participants tested in either language. These findings are consistent with the idea that the order in which digits are spoken might influence multi-digit number processing, and suggests linguistic influences on numerical estimation performance.

[1]  Manoj. T. Thomas,et al.  Penny Wise and Pound Foolish: The Left‐Digit Effect in Price Cognition , 2005 .

[2]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  A Unit-Decade Compatibility Effect in German Number Words , 2002 .

[3]  R. Siegler Magnitude knowledge: the common core of numerical development. , 2016, Developmental science.

[4]  Manoj. T. Thomas,et al.  Heuristics in Numerical Cognition: Implications for Pricing , 2008 .

[5]  Geetha B. Ramani,et al.  Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board games. , 2008, Child development.

[6]  Korbinian Moeller,et al.  Language affects symbolic arithmetic in children: the case of number word inversion. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Language effects in magnitude comparison: Small, but not irrelevant , 2005, Brain and Language.

[8]  K Moeller,et al.  One language, two number-word systems and many problems: numerical cognition in the Czech language. , 2011, Research in developmental disabilities.

[9]  H. Barth,et al.  Digit identity influences numerical estimation in children and adults. , 2018, Developmental science.

[10]  M. McCloskey Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia , 1992, Cognition.

[11]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Korbinian Moeller,et al.  On the language specificity of basic number processing: transcoding in a language with inversion and its relation to working memory capacity. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  Michael Schneider,et al.  Associations of Number Line Estimation With Mathematical Competence: A Meta-analysis. , 2018, Child development.

[14]  Korbinian Moeller,et al.  Language Effects on Children’s Nonverbal Number Line Estimations , 2011 .

[15]  Elizabeth A. Gunderson,et al.  The Number Line Is a Critical Spatial-Numerical Representation: Evidence From a Fraction Intervention , 2017, Developmental psychology.

[16]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  A general model framework for multisymbol number comparison. , 2016, Psychological review.