Willingness-to-Pay for Public Eco-tourism Services in Malaysia

The main focus of this study is to determine the attributes of willingness-to-pay (WTP) of the general public towards the entrance fee for using services in the Public Ecotourism Organization. Contingent Valuation Method is used to estimate the value of non-market good by adopting WTP approach. WTP is the maximum amount consumers are prepared to pay for a good or service and to enjoy recreational facilities. It measures whether an individual is willing to forego their income in order to obtain more goods and better services, and WTP is typically used for non-market goods. This study adopted questionnaires survey to examine the perception on the willingness to pay by visitors for the fees charged by the authorities for the services they provided. 100 local and international respondents among visitors involved in the study. The findings showed that National Park can give a new experience to visitors with beautiful natural landscape. However, the respondents perceived that road linkages of National Park are not proper and fee charged for boat services a bit too high. While, National Zoo is visited mostly to spend time and holiday with family due to attractive wildlife shows available daily. The authority however, needs to improve on hygienic aspect and perhaps to lower down the entrance fees. The attractiveness and shortcoming of the National Park and National Zoo are identified in order to suggest for improvements of services to public. As the economic growth, people will demand for better services and facilities or else willingness to pay will be affected. Thus, it is important for the government organizations to upgrade their services and facilities over time to fulfill the needs of the people.

[1]  H. Gregersen,et al.  Pricing policy in nature-based tourism , 1996 .

[2]  J. Yeoman Ecotourism and Sustainable Development. Who Owns Paradise , 2001 .

[3]  G. Withers,et al.  Strategic bias and demand for public goods: Theory and an application to the arts , 1986 .

[4]  T. Clark 3. URBAN AMENITIES: LAKES, OPERA, AND JUICE BARS: DO THEY DRIVE DEVELOPMENT? , 2003 .

[5]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries , 1996 .

[6]  C. Doerr,et al.  Willingness to Pay (WTP) , 2015 .

[7]  M. Manfredo,et al.  An attitudinal based model of pricing for recreation services. , 1991 .

[8]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? A comment , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  R. Adams,et al.  User fees and equity issues in public hunting expenditures: the case of ring-necked pheasant in Oregon. , 1989 .

[10]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods , 1998 .

[11]  P. Johansson Valuation and Aggregation , 1994 .

[12]  Fredrik Carlsson,et al.  Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden , 2000 .

[13]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[14]  Contingent Valuation Method , 2013 .

[15]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[16]  Catherine Palmer,et al.  Tourism and the symbols of identity , 1999 .

[17]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  R. Florida Cities and the Creative Class , 2003 .

[19]  D. Field,et al.  Implications of the National Park Service Recreation Fee Demonstration Program for Park Operations and Management: Perceptions of NPS Managers , 1999 .

[20]  N. Christensen,et al.  Appropriate fees for wilderness day use: pricing decisions for recreation on public land. , 1999 .

[21]  Greg Lindsey,et al.  Property Values, Recreation Values, and Urban Greenways , 2004 .

[22]  C. Tisdell,et al.  Tourist Levies and Willingness to Pay for a Whale Shark Experience , 1999 .

[23]  A. Feldman Welfare economics and social choice theory , 1980 .

[24]  J. Louviere,et al.  Stated choice models for predicting the impact of user fees at public recreation sites , 1999 .

[25]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[26]  M. Honey,et al.  Ecotourism and sustainable development , 1998 .

[27]  Kamar Ali,et al.  Voting with Their Feet: Jobs versus Amenities , 2007 .

[28]  David J. Bjornstad,et al.  The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources , 1996 .

[29]  Bernardo Duha Buchsbaum,et al.  Ecotourism and Sustainable Development in Costa Rica , 2004 .