Minimizing delivery time and monitor units in static IMRT by leaf-sequencing.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) requires the determination of the appropriate multileaf collimator settings to deliver an intensity map. The purpose of this work was to attempt to reduce the number of segments required for IMRT delivery and the number of monitor units required to deliver an intensity map. An intensity map may be written as a matrix. Leaf sequencing was formulated as a problem of decomposing the matrix into a series of sub-matrices. Sets of random intensity matrices were created and the segmentations produced by applying different algorithms were compared. The number of segments, important if verification and record (VR) overhead is significant, and beam on times were examined. It is shown that reducing the value of the matrix entries by the maximum amount at each stage results in the smallest number of steps. Reducing the 2-norm (sum of the squares) of the matrix entries by the maximum amount at each step results in the smallest beam on time. Three new algorithms are introduced, two of which produce results that are superior to those generated by the algorithms of other researchers. The resulting methods can be expanded upon to include tongue and groove effects and leaf inter-digitization. With square random matrices of the order 15, the reduction in beam time and segmentation is up to 30-40%. Compared to previous algorithms, those presented here have demonstrated a reduction in the beam on time required to deliver an intensity map by 30-40%. Similarly, the number of segments needed to deliver an intensity map is also reduced.

[1]  R Mohan,et al.  Conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer using inversely-planned intensity-modulated photon beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  S. Spirou,et al.  Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators. , 1994, Medical physics.

[3]  P. Xia,et al.  Multileaf collimator leaf sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated beams with multiple static segments. , 1998, Medical physics.

[4]  G T Chen,et al.  Fast iterative algorithms for three-dimensional inverse treatment planning. , 1998, Medical physics.

[5]  W Schlegel,et al.  Intensity modulation with the "step and shoot" technique using a commercial MLC: a planning study. Multileaf collimator. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  W. Que Comparison of algorithms for multileaf collimator field segmentation. , 1999, Medical physics.

[7]  R. Siochi,et al.  Minimizing static intensity modulation delivery time using an intensity solid paradigm. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  A Brahme,et al.  Shaping of arbitrary dose distributions by dynamic multileaf collimation. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Yi-min Hu,et al.  Intensity-modulation radiotherapy using independent collimators: an algorithm study. , 1999, Medical physics.

[10]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Realization and verification of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with modulated fields. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  J M Galvin,et al.  Combining multileaf fields to modulate fluence distributions. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  A L Boyer,et al.  Synchronizing dynamic multileaf collimators for producing two-dimensional intensity-modulated fields with minimum beam delivery time. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  R Svensson,et al.  An analytical solution for the dynamic control of multileaf collimators. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.