Artikkelen tar utgangspunkt i utviklingsarbeid i ProTed, Senter for fremragende laererutdanning, og bidrar til a belyse tre begreper av sentral betydning for utforming, utvikling og evaluering av laererutdanning. Basert pa teoriseminarer, strukturerte rapporter og annet empirisk materiale fra ProTeds utviklingsprosjekter presenterer artikkelen tre hovedbegrep: design, integrasjon og kvalitet. Design presenteres som en virksomhet, en dynamisk kompetanseutvikling hvor undervisning transformeres til laering. Kunnskapsintegrasjon forstas som et kjerne-element i et slikt design, og artikkelen utforsker ulike former for integrasjon. Artikkelen presenterer ogsa et perspektiv pa kvalitetsvurdering som legger vekt pa performative og transformative aspekt ved den kompetanseutviklingen som genereres gjennom design-virksomheten.Nokkelord: laererutdanning, design, integrasjon, kvalitet, ProTedAbstractDrawing on the developmental work of ProTed, a Norwegian Centre of Excellence in Education, this article contributes to the understanding of three concepts of central importance for the construction, development and evaluation of teacher education. Based on material from theory seminars, structured reports and other data from ProTed’s development projects, the article presents an understanding of the concepts design, integration and quality. Design is presented as an activity, a dynamic competence development where teaching is transformed into learning. Knowledge integration is understood as a core element of this design, and different forms and aspects of integration are explored. An understanding of quality evaluation is presented that emphasises performative and transformative aspects of the competence development that is generated through the design activity.Keywords: teacher education, design, integration, quality, ProTed
[1]
Lev Vygotsky.
Mind in society
,
1978
.
[2]
Duncan Harding,et al.
A framework of understanding
,
2018,
Oxford Medicine Online.
[3]
Marilyn Cochran-Smith,et al.
Framing Teacher Preparation Research
,
2015
.
[4]
Karen Hammerness.
From Coherence in Theory to Coherence in Practice
,
2006,
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
[5]
Robert E. Floden,et al.
Coherence, the Rebel Angel
,
1992
.
[6]
M. Cole,et al.
Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky.
,
1978
.
[7]
Karen Hammerness.
Examining Features of Teacher Education in Norway
,
2013
.
[8]
H. Daniels.
Vygotsky and Pedagogy
,
2001
.
[9]
S. Kemmis,et al.
Becoming Critical: Education Knowledge and Action Research
,
1986
.
[10]
Tone Kvernbekk,et al.
On the Problems of Asking for a Definition of Quality in Education
,
2011
.
[11]
Andreas Lund,et al.
Designs for Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Learning Environments
,
2011
.