The search for survivors: Cooperative human-robot interaction in search and rescue environments using semi-autonomous robots

Current applications of mobile robots in urban search and rescue (USAR) environments require a human operator in the loop to help guide the robot remotely. Although human operation can be effective, the unknown cluttered nature of the environments make robot navigation and victim identification highly challenging. Operators can become stressed and fatigued very quickly due to a loss of situational awareness, leading to the robots getting stuck and not being able to find victims in the scene during this time-sensitive operation. In addition, current autonomous robots are not capable of traversing these complex unpredictable environments. To address this challenge, a balance between the level of autonomy of the robot and the amount of human control over the robot needs to be addressed. In this paper, we present a unique control architecture for semi-autonomous navigation of a robotic platform utilizing sensory information provided by a novel real-time 3D mapping sensor. The control system provides the robot with the ability to learn and make decisions regarding which rescue tasks should be carried out at a given time and whether an autonomous robot or a human controlled robot can perform these tasks more efficiently without compromising the safety of the victims, rescue workers and the rescue robot. Preliminary experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed collaborative control approach for a USAR robot in an unknown cluttered environment.

[1]  John Anderson,et al.  Balancing Robotic Teleoperation and Autonomy for Urban Search and Rescue Environments , 2004, Canadian Conference on AI.

[2]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Strategies for Searching an Area with Semi-Autonomous Mobile Robots , 1996 .

[3]  Hong Guo,et al.  Finding Disaster Victims: A Sensory System for Robot-Assisted 3D Mapping of Urban Search and Rescue Environments , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Daniela Doroftei,et al.  A modular control architecture for semi-autonomous navigation , .

[5]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  LASSOing HRI: Analyzing situation awareness in map-centric and video-centric interfaces , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Donald D. Dudenhoeffer,et al.  Dynamic-Autonomy for Urban Search and Rescue , 2002, AAAI Mobile Robot Competition.

[7]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[8]  C. Sammut,et al.  CASTER : A Robot for Urban Search and Rescue , 2005 .

[9]  Zhe Zhang Robot-Assisted 3D Mapping of Unknown Cluttered Environments , 2007 .

[10]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Workflow study on human-robot interaction in USAR , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[11]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[12]  Paul S. Schenker,et al.  CAMPOUT: a control architecture for multirobot planetary outposts , 2000, SPIE Optics East.

[13]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Reinforcement Learning with Hierarchies of Machines , 1997, NIPS.

[14]  H. Yanco,et al.  Camera Placement and Multi-Camera Fusion for Remote Robot Operation , 2006 .

[15]  Thomas G. Dietterich Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with the MAXQ Value Function Decomposition , 1999, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[16]  Doina Precup,et al.  Between MDPs and Semi-MDPs: A Framework for Temporal Abstraction in Reinforcement Learning , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[17]  John Anderson,et al.  A Region-Based Approach to Stereo Matching for USAR , 2005, RoboCup.