Participatory design with older adults: an analysis of creativity in the design of mobile healthcare applications

Researchers often use participatory design -- involving endusers in technology ideation -- as this is found to lead to more useful and relevant products. Researchers have sought to involve older adults in the design of emerging technologies like smartphones, with which older adults often have little experience. Therefore, their effectiveness as co-designers could be questioned. We examine whether older adults can create novel design ideas, and whether critiquing existing applications prior to ideation helps or hinders creativity. Panelists from industry and academia evaluated design ideas generated by focus groups of older adults. Out of five groups, the most creative design idea came from one with no smartphone experience or critique exposure. We found that while only some designs scored high on the novelty dimension of creativity, participants were enthusiastic about participating and adapted quickly. We found evidence that critiquing existing applications prior to ideation did more harm than good, potentially due to design fixation. We recommend continuing to involve older adults in the technology design ideation phase.

[1]  Alisa E White,et al.  Assessing Advertising Creativity Using the Creative Product Semantic Scale , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[2]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Engaging older people using participatory design , 2012, CHI.

[4]  Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller Design of studies , 2001 .

[5]  Boris Bakunas Promoting idea production by novice writers through the use of discourse-related prompts , 1996, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[6]  Veerle Van Rompaey,et al.  Introducing human-centered research to game design: designing game concepts for and with senior citizens , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[7]  R. Mayer Handbook of Creativity: Fifty Years of Creativity Research , 1998 .

[8]  R. Sternberg Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[9]  Dorothy G. Dologite,et al.  Measuring creativity of information system ideas: an exploratory investigation , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Cheque mates: participatory design of digital payments with eighty somethings , 2012, CHI.

[11]  Mike Rose,et al.  Rigid Rules, Inflexible Plans, and the Stifling of Language: A Cognitivist Analysis of Writer’s Block , 1980, College Composition & Communication.

[12]  Huib de Ridder,et al.  Comparing the creativity of children's design solutions based on expert assessment , 2008, IDC.

[13]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Old is Gold: Integrating Older Workers in CSCW , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Andreas Lorenz,et al.  Personalized mobile health monitoring for elderly , 2007, Mobile HCI.

[15]  Anu Kankainen,et al.  Creative personal projects of the elderly as active engagements with interactive media technology , 2011, C&C '11.

[16]  Zachary Leader Writer's Block , 1990 .

[17]  Ronald Baecker,et al.  Using participatory activities with seniors to critique, build, and evaluate mobile phones , 2007, Assets '07.

[18]  Karen O'Quin,et al.  Analyzing Creative Products: Refinement and Test of a Judging Instrument , 1986 .

[19]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Questionable concepts: critique as resource for designing with eighty somethings , 2012, CHI.

[20]  Lynne Baillie,et al.  Senior designers: empowering seniors to design enjoyable falls rehabilitation tools , 2012, CHI.

[21]  F. Hobbs,et al.  65+ in the United States. , 1996 .

[22]  Christian Kay,et al.  The Oxford English Dictionary Online , 2004, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[23]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .