Dual endoscopic-assisted endoluminal colostomy reversal: A feasibility study

Background: Emergent colostomies are associated with increased morbidity related to second closure operations. The purpose of this canine pilot study was to create a minimally invasive procedure that would reduce the time interval and morbidity involved with colostomy reversals after left colon end colostomies. Methods: Six mongrel dogs underwent modified laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedures in which the stapled end of the rectal stump was approximated to the left colon proximal to the stoma. After 1 week, they underwent an endoluminal colostomy reversal with a computer-mediated, circular stapling device and varying anvil insertion methods. Variables recorded included anvil insertion technique and feasibility, OR time, complications, and number of days to first meal and bowel movement. A contrast enema performed 1 week post colostomy reversal ruled out anastomosis leaks and stenosis. The dogs were euthanized and subjected to necropsy. Results: Of four anvil insertion techniques tested, the most feasible employed a large-bore needle to perforate through the stapled end of the Hartmann pouch into the lumen of the left colon. Simultaneous endoluminal views of the rectal stump with a sigmoidoscope and the left colon lumen with an endoscope permitted a controlled and safe needle puncture. Through the needle, a guide wire was inserted to withdraw the anvil via the colostomy into place. A transanally inserted stapler was then married to the anvil under fluoroscopic guidance, thus completing the anastomosis. The colostomy was then taken down and transected at the level of the colocolostomy. Average operating time was 126 min (range 90–180), diet was tolerated within 1.5 days, and average number of days to first bowel movement was 2.5. The absence of stenosis, leaks, and inadvertent visceral injuries confirmed feasibility. Conclusions: In this canine model, a dual endoscopic-assisted colostomy reversal with a computer-mediated, circular stapling device is feasible. Using this technique, colostomy reversals can possibly be performed 1 week post-colostomy without entering the peritoneal cavity, thus reducing the number of invasive operations and subsequent morbidity required to manage emergent colon perforations.

[1]  A. Roe,et al.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: Timing and operative technique , 1991, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  L. E. Smith,et al.  Complications of colostomy closure , 1985, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  D. Winter,et al.  Laparoscopically Assisted Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure Revisited , 2002, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[4]  J. F. Reilly,et al.  The utility of the Hartmann procedure. , 1998, American journal of surgery.

[5]  R. Pearl,et al.  End-loop colostomy. , 1984, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[6]  R. G. Anderson,et al.  Potocytosis of small molecules and ions by caveolae. , 1993, Trends in cell biology.

[7]  J. Leyba,et al.  Colostomy Closure Using Local Anesthesia , 2001, Surgery today (Print).

[8]  M. Ravitch,et al.  A Stapling Instrument for End‐to-end Inverting Anastomoses in the Gastrointestinal Tract , 1979, Annals of surgery.

[9]  D. Fowler,et al.  Laparoscopic colostomy closure. , 1993, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[10]  L. Pemberton,et al.  Risk factors in colostomy closure. , 1981, Surgery.

[11]  M. Büchler,et al.  Primaryvs. secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV) , 2001, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[12]  J. Goligher,et al.  Use of circular stapling gun with peranal insertion of anorectal purse‐string suture for construction of very low colorectal or colo‐anal anastomoses , 1979, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  G. Velmahos,et al.  The high morbidity of colostomy closure after trauma: further support for the primary repair of colon injuries. , 1998, Surgery.

[14]  R. Natarajan,et al.  Colostomy Closure: Impact of Preoperative Risk Factors on Morbidity , 1999, The American surgeon.

[15]  F. Nance New Techniques of Gastrointestinal Anastomoses with the EEA Stapler , 1979, Annals of surgery.

[16]  J. Murray,et al.  Intraoperative colonic lavage in nonelective surgery for diverticular disease , 1997, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[17]  R. Detry,et al.  Colorectal anastomoses with the EEA stapler , 1981, World Journal of Surgery.

[18]  J. Melissas,et al.  Factors influencing the morbidity of colostomy closure. , 1988, American journal of surgery.