Redefining Participation in Online Community: Some Neglected Topics

To be sustainable, online communities must have the ability to attract and retain members, who in turn must be willing to participate by giving their time, knowledge, and effort to provide benefits to others and themselves. Yet, many studies look at participation from a static point of view and disregard different levels of participation. There is a need to redefine the concept of participation. Furthermore, many studies explaining participation in virtual communities have focused their attention on the internal characteristics of these communities neglecting the importance of the external environment such as the competition that exists between online communities and alternative media; the multiple memberships people simultaneously have in different communities/practices; the organizational and social context in which online communities exist; and the social practices online communities support. By looking at participation as an evolving process instead of as a one-time event; by giving voice to all participants of the community; and by studying the context within which communities emerge, understanding of participation can be improved. To illustrate how these topics reshape a research agenda, the authors offer examples from a current study they are undertaking shaped by these concerns. By presenting the example the authors show how awareness of the “neglected topics” identified as sensitizing ideas expands research method and deepens understanding of participation in online communities. A practice-based approach is suggested as a useful theoretical tool to deepen current understanding of online community participation. Gibrán Rivera Gonzalez University of Sheffield, UK Andrew Cox University of Sheffield, UK

[1]  Arlene J. Nicholas,et al.  The Net Generation and E-Textbooks , 2011, Int. J. Cyber Ethics Educ..

[2]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[3]  Molly B. Pepper,et al.  Responding to Hate Speech on Social Media , 2012 .

[4]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[5]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  What lurkers and posters think of each other [online community] , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[6]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  The Core and Cosmopolitans: A Relational View of Innovation in User Communities , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Continuance in expertise-sharing networks: a social perspective , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities , 2004 .

[9]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[10]  B. Nonnecke,et al.  WHY LURKERS LURK , 2001 .

[11]  Lars Bo Jeppesen,et al.  The role of lead users in knowledge sharing , 2009 .

[12]  Vanessa Hammler Kenon Global Education Access Utilizing Partnerships and Networked Global Learning Communities , 2011, Int. J. Cyber Ethics Educ..

[13]  T. Schatzki Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[14]  Steven L. Johnson SHOULD I STAY OR SHOULD I GO? CONTINUED PARTICIPATION INTENTIONS IN ONLINE COMMUNITIES. , 2010 .

[15]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Shedding Light on Lurkers in Online Communities , 1999 .

[16]  Gerry J. Mahar Factors Affecting Participation in Online Communities of Practice , 2009 .

[17]  Silvia Gherardi,et al.  Practice? It’s a Matter of Taste! , 2009 .

[18]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  What is online learner participation? A literature review , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[20]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[21]  Andrew M. Cox,et al.  An exploration of concepts of community through a case study of UK university web production , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  What Goes Online Comes Offline: Knowledge Management System Use in a Soft Bureaucracy , 2007 .

[23]  Ioannis V. Papaioannou,et al.  An Architecture Paradigm for Providing Cloud Services in School Labs Based on Open Source Software to Enhance ICT in Education , 2012, Int. J. Cyber Ethics Educ..

[24]  S. Gherardi,et al.  Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? , 2010 .

[25]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[26]  Bin Gu,et al.  Competition Among Virtual Communities and User Valuation: The Case of Investing-Related Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Theodore R. Schatzki,et al.  On Organizations as they Happen , 2006 .

[28]  Derek L. Hansen Knowledge sharing, maintenance, and use in online support communities , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[29]  L. L. Bowman,et al.  International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning , 2022 .

[30]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[33]  Molly B. Pepper,et al.  Responding to Hate Speech on Social Media: A Class Leads a Student Movement , 2012, Int. J. Cyber Ethics Educ..

[34]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Becoming (a) Practice , 2009 .

[35]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Poker Gambling Virtual Communities: The Use of Computer-Mediated Communication to Develop Cognitive Poker Gambling Skills , 2011, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[36]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[37]  Alexandre Ardichvili,et al.  Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and Enablers , 2008 .

[38]  Constance Elise Porter,et al.  Cultivating Trust and Harvesting Value in Virtual Communities , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Online communities as communities of practice: a case study , 2008, J. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  Lee Komito,et al.  The Net as a Foraging Society: Flexible Communities , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[41]  Wei Li,et al.  Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[42]  France Bélanger,et al.  Communication Media Repertoires: Dealing with the Multiplicity of Media Choices , 2007, MIS Q..

[43]  Linda Stoddart Organizational culture and knowledge sharing at the United Nations: using an intranet to create a sense of community , 2007 .

[44]  Patricia Gongla,et al.  Evolving communities of practice: IBM Global Services experience , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[45]  Ana Cristina Vasconcelos,et al.  Community and virtual community , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[46]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  A theory of online learning as online participation , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[48]  John A. Campbell,et al.  Internet Finance Forums: Investor Empowerment through CMC or Market Manipulation on a Global Scale? , 2001 .

[49]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[50]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Understanding Online Community User Participation: A Social Influence Perspective , 2011, Internet Res..

[53]  Robin Teigland,et al.  Collective Action and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  J. Grube,et al.  Developing an optimal match within online communities: an exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support , 2001 .

[55]  P. V. Baalen,et al.  Contested practice: multiple inclusion in double‐knit organizations , 2007 .

[56]  Xiaoqing Wang,et al.  An ecological perspective on online communities , 2007 .

[57]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[58]  Andreas Reckwitz Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[59]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond hearing: Where the real-world and online support meet. , 2002 .

[62]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Virtual Knowledge-Sharing Communities of Practice at Caterpillar: Success Factors and Barriers. , 2008 .

[63]  Fion S. L. Lee,et al.  Virtual community informatics: what we know and what we need to know , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[64]  International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education , 2022 .

[65]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[66]  Andrew Cox Beyond information - factors in participation in networks of practice: A case study of web management in UK higher education , 2007, J. Documentation.

[67]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  The Impact of Membership Overlap on Growth: An Ecological Competition View of Online Groups , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[68]  Patrick J. Bateman,et al.  Online Community Referrals and Commitment: How Two Aspects of Community Life Impact Member Participation , 2008 .

[69]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[70]  Constance Elise Porter,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Communities: A Multi-Disciplinary Foundation for Future Research , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[71]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[73]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[74]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..