Implementing a school drug education programme: Reflections on fidelity

Abstract A major concern in gaining accurate information about the effectiveness of health education programmes, including drug education, is the issue of fidelity of implementation. The School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project (SHAHRP), a longitudinal research study incorporating a series of lessons, is used to illustrate fidelity issues. The various methods adopted to optimise and measure the fidelity of SHAHRP implementation served several purposes: teacher training assisted in skilling and informing teachers about the importance of fidelity rigour; teacher self-report data documented the extent of completion for each activity; assessment of selected activities in student workbooks provided quantitative information about fidelity; and student self-assessment and in-depth interviews with teachers provided insight into teachers' and students' level of involvement in SHAHRP. These methods provided a rich amount of data that were then analysed using statistical means, so that implementation could be analysed against other study measures. Descriptive analysis was also undertaken so that deeper understanding of issues affecting implementation could be clearly identified. A balance of measures that meet the research requirements while also maintaining the support and goodwill of school based staff is necessary for measurement of implementation in naturalistic settings such as schools.

[1]  C. Perry,et al.  Project Northland: comprehensive alcohol use prevention for young adolescents, their parents, schools, peers and communities. , 1999, Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement.

[2]  J T Shope,et al.  Long-term follow-up of a high school alcohol misuse prevention program's effect on students' subsequent driving. , 2001, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[3]  R. Midford,et al.  School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project: Formative development of intervention materials and processes , 1999 .

[4]  S. Osganian,et al.  Design of Process Evaluation within the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) , 1994, Health education quarterly.

[5]  T. Baranowski,et al.  How best to measure implementation of school health curricula: a comparison of three measures. , 1998, Health education research.

[6]  B R Flay,et al.  Affective and social influences approaches to the prevention of multiple substance abuse among seventh grade students: results from project SMART. , 1988, Preventive medicine.

[7]  L. Green,et al.  Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach , 1991 .

[8]  T. E. Dielman,et al.  School-based research on the prevention of adolescent alcohol use and misuse: Methodological issues and advances. , 1994 .

[9]  Carolyn C Johnson,et al.  CATCH: Challenges of Conducting Process Evaluation in a Multicenter Trial , 1994, Health education quarterly.

[10]  C. Basch,et al.  Avoiding Type III Errors in Health Education Program Evaluations: A Case Study , 1985, Health education quarterly.

[11]  R. Midford,et al.  Alcohol harm reduction education in schools: planning an efficacy study in Australia , 2000 .

[12]  R. Midford,et al.  Early results from a school alcohol harm minimization study: the School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project. , 2000, Addiction.

[13]  M. Pentz,et al.  Implementation issues in drug abuse prevention research. , 1991, NIDA research monograph.

[14]  J. Schulenberg,et al.  Reasons to drink and not to drink: Altering trajectories of drinking through an alcohol misuse prevention program , 1998 .

[15]  G. Parcel,et al.  Enhancing implementation of the teenage health teaching modules. , 1991, The Journal of school health.

[16]  D. Connell,et al.  Summary of findings of the School Health Education Evaluation: health promotion effectiveness, implementation, and costs. , 1985, The Journal of school health.

[17]  J. Graham,et al.  Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: predictors of program implementation. , 1993, Preventive medicine.

[18]  H De Vries,et al.  Effectiveness of a social influence approach and boosters to smoking prevention. , 1999, Health education research.