Acoustic cues to the voicing feature in tracheoesophageal speech.

Tracheoesophageal (TE) speakers often have difficulty producing the voiced/voiceless distinction. This limitation has been attributed to use of the pharyngoesophageal segment as the phonatory source. The nature of this tissue may preclude precise control of voicing onset, a contributing cue to a phoneme's voicing feature, at least in laryngeal speech. The purpose of this study was to determine whether voiced and voiceless consonants produced by TE speakers could be differentiated from those produced by laryngeal speakers using four acoustic measures associated with the voicing characteristic of consonants in laryngeal speech. Sixteen TE and ten laryngeal speakers produced five stop and fricative cognate pairs embedded in a carrier phrase. Three of the four acoustic measures contributed significantly to the discriminant models that differentiated accurately perceived TE and laryngeal samples. The three variables were consonant sound pressure level, consonant duration, and preceding vowel duration. In general, values for each measure were higher/longer for the TE group. The discriminant functions were interpreted as a reflection of TE speaker attempts at overarticulation.

[1]  Improving alaryngeal speech intelligibility. , 1990, Journal of communication disorders.

[2]  G H Yeni-Komshian,et al.  Temporal changes in word revisions by children and adults. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  D. Klatt Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C. Ferrand,et al.  Factor analysis of proficient esophageal speech: toward a multidimensional model. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  B Weinberg,et al.  Voice onset time in Thai alaryngeal speech. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[6]  A. Cohen,et al.  On the Complex Regulating the Voiced-Voiceless Distinction I , 1969, Language and speech.

[7]  N I Durlach,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  B Weinberg,et al.  Productive voice onset time characteristics of esophageal speech. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  A. Holland Introduction: Peering into the future , 2001 .

[10]  S. Gordon-Salant Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R H Pindzola,et al.  Acceptability ratings of tracheoesophageal speech , 1988, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  Correlates of Turbulent Noise Production for Speech , 1967 .

[13]  Lawrence J. Raphael,et al.  On Defining the Vowel Duration That Cues Voicing in Final Position , 1980, Language and speech.

[14]  W. S. Brown,et al.  Aerodynamic and acoustic study of stress in sentence productions. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Watson,et al.  Differences in speaking proficiencies in three laryngectomee groups. , 1985, Archives of otolaryngology.

[16]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  V. Zue,et al.  Acoustic study of medial /t,d/ in American English , 1979 .

[18]  J Robbins,et al.  Acoustic differentiation of laryngeal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  M A Zlatin,et al.  Voicing contrast: perceptual and productive voice onset time characteristics of adults. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  L. Lisker Closure Duration and the Intervocalic Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in English , 1957 .

[21]  P C Doyle,et al.  Effects of listener sophistication on judgements of tracheoesophageal talker intelligibility. , 1989, Journal of communication disorders.

[22]  M A Carpenter,et al.  Intelligibility of stops and fricatives in tracheoesophageal speech. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.

[23]  D. Klatt Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[25]  M. Singer,et al.  An Endoscopic Technique for Restoration of Voice after Laryngectomy , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[26]  Fricative duration in esophageal speech. , 1981, Journal of communication disorders.

[27]  M. Andrews,et al.  Acceptability and intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech. , 1985, Archives of otolaryngology.

[28]  D. Klatt,et al.  The duration of (s) in English words. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  Jean‐Pierre A. Radley,et al.  Acoustic Properties of Stop Consonants , 1957 .

[30]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[31]  C. Coelho,et al.  Phonatory characteristics of parkinsonian speech before and after morning medication: the ON and OFF states. , 2002, Journal of communication disorders.

[32]  P. Denes Effect of Duration on the Perception of Voicing , 1955 .

[33]  N. Umeda Vowel duration in American English. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  S. M. Sapon,et al.  Note on Vowel Duration Seen Cross‐Linguistically , 1958 .

[35]  W S Winholtz,et al.  Conversion of a head-mounted microphone signal into calibrated SPL units. , 1997, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[36]  I. Hirsh,et al.  Development of speech sounds in children. , 1969, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[37]  A. House On Vowel Duration in English , 1961 .

[38]  M. Singer,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[39]  M. Singer,et al.  A prospective study of tracheoesophageal speech. , 1986, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[40]  L. Lisker,et al.  Some Effects of Context On Voice Onset Time in English Stops , 1967, Language and speech.

[41]  M HYMAN,et al.  An experimental study of artificial-larynx and esophageal speech. , 1955, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[42]  R. Cole,et al.  Perception of voicing in English affricates and fricatives. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  J. Stemple,et al.  Assessment of three modes of alaryngeal speech with a synthetic sentence identification (SSI) task in varying message-to-competition ratios. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[44]  L. Raphael Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  J. Matthews,et al.  FACTORS RELATED TO SPEECH PROFICIENCY OF THE LARYNGECTOMIZED. , 1963, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[46]  N Bi,et al.  Enhancement of female esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .