Laboratory observation of quantum control level sets

In controlled quantum dynamics, a level set is defined as the collection of control fields that produce a specific value for a particular observable. This paper explores the relationship between individual solutions to a control problem, and presents the first experimentally observed quantum control level sets, which are found to be continuous submanifolds. Level sets are observed for two photon transitions where the control is the spectral phase function, which is expressed as a fourth-order polynomial. For the systems studied here, the level sets are shown to be closed surfaces in the spectral phase control space. A perturbation analysis provides insight into the observed topology of the level set, which is shown to be preserved by the low-order polynomial phase representation. Each of the multiple control fields forming a level set preserves the observable value by its own distinct manipulation of constructive and destructive quantum interferences. Thus, the richness of quantum control fields meeting a particular observable value is accompanied by an equally diverse family of control mechanisms.

[1]  Herschel A Rabitz,et al.  Quantum Optimally Controlled Transition Landscapes , 2004, Science.

[2]  Michael Hsieh,et al.  Quantum optimal control: Hessian analysis of the control landscape. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  Shkurinov,et al.  Second harmonic generation in an optically active liquid: Experimental observation of a fourth-order optical nonlinearity due to molecular chirality. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[4]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  Assessing and managing laser system stability for quantum control experiments , 2006 .

[5]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Landscape for optimal control of quantum-mechanical unitary transformations , 2005 .

[6]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Optimal control landscapes for quantum observables. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  Rabitz,et al.  Optimally controlled quantum molecular dynamics: A perturbation formulation and the existence of multiple solutions. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[8]  Yaron Silberberg,et al.  Coherent quantum control of multiphoton transitions by shaped ultrashort optical pulses , 1999 .

[9]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Teaching lasers to control molecules. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[10]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  Observable-preserving control of quantum dynamics over a family of related systems , 2005 .

[11]  A. Weiner Femtosecond pulse shaping using spatial light modulators , 2000 .

[12]  C. Trallero-Herrero,et al.  Strong-field atomic phase matching. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[13]  A. Bartelt,et al.  Assuring robustness to noise in optimal quantum control experiments (9 pages) , 2005 .

[14]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Transformations to diagonal bases in closed-loop quantum learning control experiments. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  A. Rothman,et al.  Exploring the level sets of quantum control landscapes (9 pages) , 2006 .

[16]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[17]  Florian Langhojer,et al.  Gaining mechanistic insight from closed loop learning control: the importance of basis in searching the phase space. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  G. Gerber,et al.  Femtosecond learning control of quantum dynamics in gases and liquids: Technology and applications , 2003 .

[19]  D. Marcuse,et al.  Pulse distortion in single-mode fibers. , 1980, Applied optics.

[20]  C. Conover,et al.  Closed-loop control of intense-laser fragmentation of S 8 , 2005 .

[21]  C. Lupulescu,et al.  Temporal and spectral optimization course analysis of coherent control experiments , 2004 .

[22]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  Identifying mechanisms in the control of quantum dynamics through Hamiltonian encoding , 2003 .