Reduced social function in experimentally evolved Dictyostelium discoideum implies selection for social conflict in nature

Many microbes interact with one another, but the difficulty of directly observing these interactions in nature makes interpreting their adaptive value complicated. The social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum forms aggregates wherein some cells are sacrificed for the benefit of others. Within chimeric aggregates containing multiple unrelated lineages, cheaters can gain an advantage by undercontributing, but the extent to which wild D. discoideum has adapted to cheat is not fully clear. In this study, we experimentally evolved D. discoideum in an environment where there were no selective pressures to cheat or resist cheating in chimeras. D. discoideum lines grown in this environment evolved reduced competitiveness within chimeric aggregates and reduced ability to migrate during the slug stage. By contrast, we did not observe a reduction in cell number, a trait for which selection was not relaxed. The observed loss of traits that our laboratory conditions had made irrelevant suggests that these traits were adaptations driven and maintained by selective pressures D. discoideum faces in its natural environment. Our results suggest that D. discoideum faces social conflict in nature, and illustrate a general approach that could be applied to searching for social or non-social adaptations in other microbes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Microbes interact in diverse and important ways, but the difficulty of directly observing microbes in nature can make it challenging to understand the adaptive significance of these interactions. In this study, we present an experimental evolution approach to infer the selective pressures behind an apparently social trait in the microbe Dictyostelium discoideum. We take advantage of the observation that organisms ‘use it or lose it’ – when selective pressures are relaxed, adaptations that evolved in response to those pressures tend to be lost. Our work helps resolve debate over the importance of cheating in D. discoideum, and demonstrates a general approach that could be applied to the study of other microbial traits that are difficult to observe in nature.

[1]  Valentin Amrhein,et al.  Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation , 2022, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[2]  K. Sears,et al.  Unraveling the heritage of lost traits. , 2021, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[3]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Wild Dictyostelium discoideum social amoebae show plastic responses to the presence of nonrelatives during multicellular development , 2020, Ecology and evolution.

[4]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Fitness costs and benefits vary for two facultative Burkholderia symbionts of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[5]  Araxi O. Urrutia,et al.  Conditional expression explains molecular evolution of social genes in a microbe , 2019, Nature Communications.

[6]  E. Ostrowski Enforcing Cooperation in the Social Amoebae , 2019, Current Biology.

[7]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Genetic signatures of microbial altruism and cheating in social amoebas in the wild , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  C. Nadell,et al.  Dynamic biofilm architecture confers individual and collective mechanisms of viral protection , 2017, Nature Microbiology.

[9]  Corina E. Tarnita,et al.  Lack of Ecological and Life History Context Can Create the Illusion of Social Interactions in Dictyostelium discoideum , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  J. Strassmann Kin Discrimination in Dictyostelium Social Amoebae , 2016, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[11]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Fine‐scale spatial ecology drives kin selection relatedness among cooperating amoebae , 2016, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Burkholderia bacteria infectiously induce the proto-farming symbiosis of Dictyostelium amoebae and food bacteria , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Yufeng Shen,et al.  Genomic Signatures of Cooperation and Conflict in the Social Amoeba , 2015, Current Biology.

[14]  Katie Parkinson,et al.  Fitness Trade-offs Result in the Illusion of Social Success , 2015, Current Biology.

[15]  Corina E. Tarnita,et al.  Fitness tradeoffs between spores and nonaggregating cells can explain the coexistence of diverse genotypes in cellular slime molds , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Fruiting bodies of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum increase spore transport by Drosophila , 2014, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[17]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Kin Recognition Protects Cooperators against Cheaters , 2013, Current Biology.

[18]  R. Saha,et al.  Microbial siderophores: a mini review , 2013, Journal of basic microbiology.

[19]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  A new social gene in Dictyostelium discoideum, chtB , 2013, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[20]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Structured growth and genetic drift raise relatedness in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2012, Biology Letters.

[21]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[22]  R. Lenski,et al.  The Black Queen Hypothesis: Evolution of Dependencies through Adaptive Gene Loss , 2012, mBio.

[23]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Combating the Assumption of Evolutionary Progress: Lessons from the Decay and Loss of Traits , 2012, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[24]  M. Travisano,et al.  Experimental evolution of multicellularity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  J. Strassmann,et al.  High Relatedness Is Necessary and Sufficient to Maintain Multicellularity in Dictyostelium , 2011, Science.

[26]  N. Moran,et al.  Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[27]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Evolution of cooperation and control of cheating in a social microbe , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  R. Lenski,et al.  Negative Epistasis Between Beneficial Mutations in an Evolving Bacterial Population , 2011, Science.

[29]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Primitive agriculture in a social amoeba , 2011, Nature.

[30]  D. B. Kearns,et al.  A field guide to bacterial swarming motility , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[31]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Cheating by Exploitation of Developmental Prestalk Patterning in Dictyostelium discoideum , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[32]  M. Vos,et al.  Sociobiology of the myxobacteria. , 2009, Annual review of microbiology.

[33]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Relaxed selection in the wild. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  Jason B. Wolf,et al.  Quantification of Social Behavior in D. discoideum Reveals Complex Fixed and Facultative Strategies , 2009, Current Biology.

[35]  E. Szathmáry,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION , 2009 .

[36]  P. Fisher,et al.  Dictyostelium discoideum—a model for many reasons , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry.

[37]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Polymorphic Members of the lag Gene Family Mediate Kin Discrimination in Dictyostelium , 2009, Current Biology.

[38]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Kin Discrimination Increases with Genetic Distance in a Social Amoeba , 2008, PLoS biology.

[39]  N. Colegrave,et al.  Decay of unused characters by selection and drift , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[40]  Anup Parikh,et al.  Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae , 2008, Nature.

[41]  E. Ostrowski,et al.  A NEGATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MUTATION PLEIOTROPY AND FITNESS EFFECT IN YEAST , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  U. Lins,et al.  'Candidatus Magnetoglobus multicellularis', a multicellular, magnetotactic prokaryote from a hypersaline environment. , 2007, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[43]  Kevin R Foster,et al.  High relatedness maintains multicellular cooperation in a social amoeba by controlling cheater mutants , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  E. Ostrowski,et al.  PLEIOTROPIC EFFECTS OF BENEFICIAL MUTATIONS IN ESCHERICHIA COLI , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  K. Jefferson,et al.  What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? , 2004, FEMS microbiology letters.

[46]  C. Darwin The Origin of Species and the Voyage of the Beagle , 2003 .

[47]  J. Strassmann,et al.  A linear dominance hierarchy among clones in chimeras of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[48]  R. Redfield Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? , 2002, Trends in microbiology.

[49]  P. Fisher Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity: Richard H. Kessin. Bibliography by Jakob Franke, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Publication Date: 11th January, 2001. xiv+294 pp. ISBN 0-521-58364-0 (hardback). Price: £55.00 (US$90.00) , 2001 .

[50]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[51]  W. Wcislo,et al.  Secondarily solitary: the evolutionary loss of social behavior. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  R. Lenski,et al.  Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[54]  R. Lenski,et al.  Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and Divergence During 2,000 Generations , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[55]  M. J. Huss Dispersal of Cellular Slime Molds by two Soil Invertebrates , 1989 .

[56]  Doug P. Armstrong,et al.  Why don't cellular slime molds cheat? , 1984 .

[57]  L W Buss,et al.  Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  K. Nealson,et al.  Bacterial bioluminescence: its control and ecological significance , 1979, Microbiological reviews.

[59]  R. Lewontin ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[60]  M. Sussman,et al.  Commitment to the synthesis of a specific enzyme during cellular slime mold development. , 1966, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  V. Wynne-Edwards Group Selection and Kin Selection , 1964, Nature.

[62]  W. Hamilton The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[63]  John Tyler Bonner,et al.  A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SLIME MOLD DICTYOSTELIUM DISCOIDEUM , 1944 .

[64]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Cellular allorecognition and its roles in Dictyostelium development and social evolution. , 2019, The International journal of developmental biology.

[65]  Lena Osterhagen Adaptation And Natural Selection A Critique Of Some Current Evolutionary Thought , 2016 .

[66]  K. Foster,et al.  A cost to chimerism in Dictyostelium discoideum on natural substrates , 2005 .

[67]  M. H. Smith Genotypic diversity and population structure in Dictyostelium discoideum , 2004 .

[68]  M. Riley,et al.  Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology, and application. , 2002, Annual review of microbiology.

[69]  R. Kessin,et al.  Dictyostelium amoebae lacking an F-box protein form spores rather than stalk in chimeras with wild type. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  W. Loomis,et al.  Dictyostelium discoideum , 1975, Nature.