Quality Criteria for Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research: A View from Social Policy

This article reports some findings from an investigation of social policy researchers in the UK. The findings relate to the quality criteria that social policy researchers deem to be appropriate to quantitative research, qualitative research and mixed methods research. The data derive from an e‐survey of researchers which was followed up by semi‐structured interviews with a purposively selected sample from among those e‐survey respondents who agreed to be interviewed. The article emphasises the findings that relate to quality criteria for mixed methods research, since this is an area that has not attracted a great deal of attention. Greater agreement was found regarding the criteria that should be employed for assessing quantitative than qualitative research. The findings relating to mixed methods research point to a preference for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative research criteria and for employing different criteria for the quantitative and the qualitative components.

[1]  Alan Bryman,et al.  Paradigm Peace and the Implications for Quality , 2006 .

[2]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[3]  Sue Duncan,et al.  A User Perspective on Research Quality , 2006 .

[4]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[5]  A. Bryman Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? , 2006 .

[6]  Katrin Niglas,et al.  THE COMBINED USE OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ABSTRACT , 2004 .

[7]  Kevin Brazil,et al.  A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies , 2004, Quality & quantity.

[8]  Susan Wright,et al.  Coercive accountability: the rise of audit culture in higher education , 2003 .

[9]  Alan Bryman,et al.  The Research Question in Social Research: What is its Role? , 2007 .

[10]  Lois Quam,et al.  The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification , 1998 .

[11]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  Lucy Dillon,et al.  Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. A quality framework. , 2003 .

[13]  Ray Pawson,et al.  Digging for Nuggets: How ‘Bad’ Research Can Yield ‘Good’ Evidence , 2006 .

[14]  Angela Dale,et al.  Quality Issues with Survey Research , 2006 .

[15]  L. Yardley Dilemmas in qualitative health research , 2000 .