Tweet acts: how constituents lobby congress via Twitter

Twitter is increasingly becoming a medium through which constituents can lobby their elected representatives in Congress about issues that matter to them. Past research has focused on how citizens communicate with each other or how members of Congress (MOCs) use social media in general; our research examines how citizens communicate with MOCs. We contribute to existing literature through the careful examination of hundreds of citizen-authored tweets and the development of a categorization scheme to describe common strategies of lobbying on Twitter. Our findings show that contrary to past research that assumed citizens used Twitter to merely shout out their opinions on issues, citizens utilize a variety of sophisticated techniques to impact political outcomes.

[1]  J. Searle.  A classification of illocutionary acts , 1976, Language in Society.

[2]  Henrik Serup Christensen.  Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? , 2011, First Monday.

[3]  Csr Young,et al.  How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .

[4]  Libby Hemphill,et al.  "I'd have to vote against you": issue campaigning via twitter , 2013, CSCW '13.

[5]  Muhammad Zubair Shafiq,et al.  Is news sharing on Twitter ideologically biased? , 2013, CSCW.

[6]  John H. Kessel.  Comment: The Issues in Issue Voting , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[7]  John H. Parmelee,et al.  Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public , 2011 .

[8]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Pass it on?: Retweeting in mass emergency , 2010, ISCRAM.

[9]  Michelle Sidler,et al.  Genetics Interfaces: Representing Science and Enacting Public Discourse in Online Spaces , 2008 .

[10]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  The Prevalence of Political Discourse in Non-Political Blogs , 2011, ICWSM.

[11]  Dennis McCafferty,et al.  Activism vs. slacktivism , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[12]  Matthew A. Shapiro,et al.  What's congress doing on twitter? , 2013, CSCW.

[13]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  The Two Faces of Issue Voting , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[14]  Kevin Fredette,et al.  Electronic democracy: Using the internet to influence american politics , 1997 .

[15]  Aron Culotta,et al.  Framing in Social Media: How the U.S. Congress uses Twitter hashtags to frame political issues Introduction , 2013 .

[16]  Grace Hui Yang,et al.  Near-duplicate detection by instance-level constrained clustering , 2006, SIGIR.

[17]  Frank Parker.  Linguistics for non-linguists , 1986 .

[18]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  Tweet recall: examining real-time civic discourse on twitter , 2012, GROUP '12.

[19]  Rob Kling,et al.  Hopes and Horrors: Technological Utopianism and Anti-Utopianism in Narratives of Computerization , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[20]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  From slacktivism to activism: participatory culture in the age of social media , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  Lawrence K. Grossman.  The electronic republic , 1995 .

[22]  Libby Hemphill,et al.  How Constituents Lobby Members of Congress on Twitter , 2013 .

[23]  J. Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010 .

[24]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.