An empirical validation of modelling solar gain through a glazing unit with external and internal shading screens

Abstract Empirical validations are integral components in assessing the overall accuracies of building energy simulation programs. Two test cell experiments were performed at the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Testing and Research’s (EMPA) campus in Duebendorf, Switzerland to evaluate the solar gain models with external and internal shading screens in four building energy simulation programs including: (1) EnergyPlus, (2) DOE-2.1E, (3) TRNSYS-TUD, and (4) ESP-r. Detailed information about the shading screen properties, modeling procedures, and thorough statistical and sensitivity analyses of simulation results are provided. For the external shading screen experiment, the mean percentage of the absolute difference between measured and simulated cooling power to maintain a near-constant cell air temperature for EnergyPlus, DOE-2.1E, TRNSYS-TUD and ESP-r were 3.7%, 5.5%, 10.6%, and 7.5%, respectively. EnergyPlus and DOE-2.1E were considered validated within 95% credible limits. For the internal shading screen experiment, the mean percentage of the absolute mean differences for EnergyPlus, DOE-2.1E, TRNSYS-TUD, and ESP-r were 6.7%. 13.8%, 5.7%, and 4.3%, respectively; only ESP-r was considered validated within 95% credible limits.

[1]  Paul Strachan,et al.  Series of experiments for empirical validation of solar gain modeling in building energy simulation codes—Experimental setup, test cell characterization, specifications and uncertainty analysis , 2006 .

[2]  Joseph Andrew Clarke,et al.  Energy Simulation in Building Design , 1985 .

[3]  R. D. Judkoff,et al.  Validation of building energy analysis simulation programs at the solar energy research institute , 1988 .

[4]  Gregory M. Maxwell,et al.  A comparison of DOE-2.1E daylighting and HVAC system interactions to actual building performance , 2006 .

[5]  P. Wouters,et al.  The use of outdoor test cells for thermal and solar building research within the PASSYS project , 1993 .

[6]  Søren Østergaard Jensen,et al.  Validation of building energy simulation programs: a methodology , 1995 .

[7]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Improved data correlations for buoyancy-driven convection in rooms , 1983 .

[8]  H. Manz,et al.  Empirical validation of models to compute solar irradiance on inclined surfaces for building energy simulation , 2007 .

[9]  Georgios A. Florides,et al.  Modeling of the modern houses of Cyprus and energy consumption analysis , 2000 .

[10]  P. Strachan,et al.  Model validation using the PASSYS Test cells , 1993 .

[11]  J. Michalsky,et al.  Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance , 1990 .

[12]  Gregory M. Maxwell,et al.  An Empirical Validation of Modeling Solar Gains Through a Glazing Unit Using Building Energy Simulation Programs , 2006 .

[13]  Kevin J. Lomas,et al.  Empirical validation of building energy simulation programs , 1997 .

[14]  Gregory M. Maxwell,et al.  Economizer Control Tests for the Empirical Validation of Building Energy Analysis Tools A Report of Task 22, Subtask D Building Energy Analysis Tools Project D Empirical Validation , 2004 .